Edgar J. Kaiser
Certified Consultant
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
9 years ago
3 déc. 2015, 13:24 UTC−5
Hi Nadia,
the relative permittivity of gold (and most metals) at 104 MHz is pretty meaningless because the skin depth is less than a micrometer.
What exactly do you think you need it for?
Cheers
Edgar
--
Edgar J. Kaiser
emPhys Physical Technology
www.emphys.com
Hi Nadia,
the relative permittivity of gold (and most metals) at 104 MHz is pretty meaningless because the skin depth is less than a micrometer.
What exactly do you think you need it for?
Cheers
Edgar
--
Edgar J. Kaiser
emPhys Physical Technology
http://www.emphys.com
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
9 years ago
4 déc. 2015, 11:25 UTC−5
Dear Edgar,
Thank you for your reponse.
It is used for SAW (Surface Acoustic Wave) sensor. The interdigitated electrodes and the sensing zone are covered with Gold.
Best regards,
Nadia.
Dear Edgar,
Thank you for your reponse.
It is used for SAW (Surface Acoustic Wave) sensor. The interdigitated electrodes and the sensing zone are covered with Gold.
Best regards,
Nadia.
Edgar J. Kaiser
Certified Consultant
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
9 years ago
4 déc. 2015, 16:12 UTC−5
Nadia,
I assume that the gold coatings are much thicker than the skin depth at 104 MHz. So an impedance BC would typically by sufficient for the electrodes.
Cheers
Edgar
--
Edgar J. Kaiser
emPhys Physical Technology
www.emphys.com
Nadia,
I assume that the gold coatings are much thicker than the skin depth at 104 MHz. So an impedance BC would typically by sufficient for the electrodes.
Cheers
Edgar
--
Edgar J. Kaiser
emPhys Physical Technology
http://www.emphys.com