Discussion Closed This discussion was created more than 6 months ago and has been closed. To start a new discussion with a link back to this one, click here.
Fillet
Posted 19 févr. 2015, 10:04 UTC−5 2 Replies
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Hello,
I am trying to model the magnetic flux distribution.
For the same scenario, in one version I added fillets to some key rough edges and in the other version no fillets were added.
You can clearly see that the scenario with fillet shows a higher flux concentration on those edges. Is this a mistake in the software or is it really the case in reality?
Regards,
Jad
I am trying to model the magnetic flux distribution.
For the same scenario, in one version I added fillets to some key rough edges and in the other version no fillets were added.
You can clearly see that the scenario with fillet shows a higher flux concentration on those edges. Is this a mistake in the software or is it really the case in reality?
Regards,
Jad
2 Replies Last Post 19 févr. 2015, 10:55 UTC−5
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
10 years ago
Hello Jad,
See www.comsol.com/blogs/fillet-away-your-electromagnetic-field-singularities/ which explains why an unfilleted geometry can result in a strongly mesh-dependent result.
Best,
Jeff
See www.comsol.com/blogs/fillet-away-your-electromagnetic-field-singularities/ which explains why an unfilleted geometry can result in a strongly mesh-dependent result.
Best,
Jeff
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
10 years ago
thank you for the link Jeff!