Menu

Discussion Forum

New Discussion
Filtrer

Note: This discussion is about an older version of the COMSOL Multiphysics® software. The information provided may be out of date.

Discussion Closed This discussion was created more than 6 months ago and has been closed. To start a new discussion with a link back to this one, click here.

Parallel plate capacitor 2D vs 3D issue

Posted 19 nov. 2014, 11:55 UTC−5 Low-Frequency Electromagnetics, Geometry, Modeling Tools & Definitions Version 4.4 5 Replies

Saliya Kumara
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

I'm a beginner COMSOL user. I came across this problem while i'm doing some test simulations. I've simulated a parallel plate capacitor in both 3D and 2D. I wanted to see if I can extract the same results from the 3D if I use a cut plane. So I created a cut plane so the resultant would be similar to a 2D situation. However when I extract the electric field directions, they do not look even remotely close to the results from 2D simualtion. I've attached two images from two simulations. I'm using "Electrostatic (es)" in both cases and all the materials are same in both cases. I would be very grateful if anyone can point out what I'm doing wrong.

Thank You.

Attachments:

5 Replies Last Post 20 nov. 2014, 11:23 UTC−5
Edgar J. Kaiser Certified Consultant
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 19 nov. 2014, 16:28 UTC−5
Hi,

something must be wrong with the arrow surface plot. If you upload the model (delete the solution if it is too big) we could have a look.

Cheers
Edgar

--
Edgar J. Kaiser
emPhys Physical Technology
www.emphys.com
Hi, something must be wrong with the arrow surface plot. If you upload the model (delete the solution if it is too big) we could have a look. Cheers Edgar -- Edgar J. Kaiser emPhys Physical Technology http://www.emphys.com
Saliya Kumara
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 19 nov. 2014, 17:17 UTC−5
Thank you for your reply Edgar. Original file size was about 50MB and it did not change even I deleted the solution and mesh. Therefore I created another file similar to the original file. Please find it attached(3MB).

All I did was simulated the model and created a 2D plot with a potential surface and a arrow surface representing the electric field. (I used a cut plane on the zx plane.)

Thank You.
Thank you for your reply Edgar. Original file size was about 50MB and it did not change even I deleted the solution and mesh. Therefore I created another file similar to the original file. Please find it attached(3MB). All I did was simulated the model and created a 2D plot with a potential surface and a arrow surface representing the electric field. (I used a cut plane on the zx plane.) Thank You.
Edgar J. Kaiser Certified Consultant
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 20 nov. 2014, 06:57 UTC−5
I modified your model according to your description, looks ok to my taste. You didn't send your model so I can't say what is wrong there.
I am trying to attach the modified model, but it doesn't seem to work.

Yes the attachment didn't work. You can send an email address by private message if you want and I will send the model this way.

--
Edgar J. Kaiser
emPhys Physical Technology
www.emphys.com
I modified your model according to your description, looks ok to my taste. You didn't send your model so I can't say what is wrong there. I am trying to attach the modified model, but it doesn't seem to work. Yes the attachment didn't work. You can send an email address by private message if you want and I will send the model this way. -- Edgar J. Kaiser emPhys Physical Technology http://www.emphys.com
Jeff Hiller COMSOL Employee

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 20 nov. 2014, 08:15 UTC−5
Hello Saliya,
Check whether in the arrrow plot in your 3D cut plane you are plotting the _in-plane_ components of the E field. I suspect you are not.
Best,
Jeff
PS: Usually, with simulations like these, you do not include the electrodes in the model: they are considered perfectly conducting and you know in advance that the potential is going to be constant in each of them, so you remove them from the geometry and only solve for the potential in the dielectric (i.e. you subtract the two blocks from the sphere). As a result you only need air as a material (no copper).
Hello Saliya, Check whether in the arrrow plot in your 3D cut plane you are plotting the _in-plane_ components of the E field. I suspect you are not. Best, Jeff PS: Usually, with simulations like these, you do not include the electrodes in the model: they are considered perfectly conducting and you know in advance that the potential is going to be constant in each of them, so you remove them from the geometry and only solve for the potential in the dielectric (i.e. you subtract the two blocks from the sphere). As a result you only need air as a material (no copper).
Saliya Kumara
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 20 nov. 2014, 11:23 UTC−5
Hello Edgar and Jeff,

Thank You for your responses. Jeff you were spot on. My plane was a xz plane and I was plotting x and y components on the plane(beginner mistake). Now that I corrected it, it looks the way it should be. That was a great tip to subtract the blocks from the sphere.

Thank You.
Saliya

Hello Edgar and Jeff, Thank You for your responses. Jeff you were spot on. My plane was a xz plane and I was plotting x and y components on the plane(beginner mistake). Now that I corrected it, it looks the way it should be. That was a great tip to subtract the blocks from the sphere. Thank You. Saliya

Note that while COMSOL employees may participate in the discussion forum, COMSOL® software users who are on-subscription should submit their questions via the Support Center for a more comprehensive response from the Technical Support team.

Suggested Content