Note: This discussion is about an older version of the COMSOL Multiphysics® software. The information provided may be out of date.
Discussion Closed This discussion was created more than 6 months ago and has been closed. To start a new discussion with a link back to this one, click here.
Problem in convective flow simulation
Posted 21 août 2014, 04:48 UTC−4 Fluid & Heat, Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD), Chemical Reaction Engineering, Studies & Solvers Version 4.4 4 Replies
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
I am now trying to solve magnetophoresis model by coupling CFD and transport of dilute chemical species modules together. I want to study the dynamical behaviour of the process and I used Time-Dependent solver in my study. However, I found that 'Nonlinear solver did not converge' when I used finer mesh in my computation. Also, I found that it is more difficult to converge when I want to do the simulation for a longer time range.
The solver does converge when I used a coarser mesh and simulate for shorter time range. Yet, solver gives different solution for each computation (or study) and I think that the solution is not reliable due to the extremely coarse meshing.
I know this is a highly non-linear model as it involves convective flow (due to buoyancy force) and transport of chemical species. Is it possible to improve the convergence of the solver in order to solve this highly non-linear model by using a finer mesh? Thank you.
--
Leong
The solver does converge when I used a coarser mesh and simulate for shorter time range. Yet, solver gives different solution for each computation (or study) and I think that the solution is not reliable due to the extremely coarse meshing.
I know this is a highly non-linear model as it involves convective flow (due to buoyancy force) and transport of chemical species. Is it possible to improve the convergence of the solver in order to solve this highly non-linear model by using a finer mesh? Thank you.
--
Leong
4 Replies Last Post 26 août 2014, 11:02 UTC−4