Ivar KJELBERG
COMSOL Multiphysics(r) fan, retired, former "Senior Expert" at CSEM SA (CH)
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
7 mai 2013, 02:04 UTC−4
Hi
I'm not that sure that the thets are less correct than quads, have you checked with COMSOL ? but OK,
To mesh that one, I would propose to mesh the entry, (then you could try a sweep mesh for the full tube, it might go as is ;) or then copy the entry boundary mesh onto all the boundary ends of the straight sections, and then sweep mesh the elements, either all, or by segments, if all is not working
You might need to convert the external boundary elements to tri to mesh the surrounding
--
Good luck
Ivar
Hi
I'm not that sure that the thets are less correct than quads, have you checked with COMSOL ? but OK,
To mesh that one, I would propose to mesh the entry, (then you could try a sweep mesh for the full tube, it might go as is ;) or then copy the entry boundary mesh onto all the boundary ends of the straight sections, and then sweep mesh the elements, either all, or by segments, if all is not working
You might need to convert the external boundary elements to tri to mesh the surrounding
--
Good luck
Ivar
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
7 mai 2013, 09:16 UTC−4
Hi Ivar,
Thanks for your reply!
It is easy to map the embedded loop which, by the way, is hollow. See attached file. And I know I could convert the boundary of this loop to tri to mesh the rest part of this slab.
The problem is that this way has no essentially difference,apart from the advantage of control of mesh size, from the way I use Free Tetrahedral directly.
I want to use hexahedron. Do you think this is possible?
The second question is how to couple shell part with block. I searched in this forum. It seems that up to now the model library doesn't have this type of model, right?
Really appreciate your time!
Jiaxing
Hi Ivar,
Thanks for your reply!
It is easy to map the embedded loop which, by the way, is hollow. See attached file. And I know I could convert the boundary of this loop to tri to mesh the rest part of this slab.
The problem is that this way has no essentially difference,apart from the advantage of control of mesh size, from the way I use Free Tetrahedral directly.
I want to use hexahedron. Do you think this is possible?
The second question is how to couple shell part with block. I searched in this forum. It seems that up to now the model library doesn't have this type of model, right?
Really appreciate your time!
Jiaxing
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
9 years ago
20 oct. 2015, 16:17 UTC−4
Hi,
Here you have mentioned the swept meshing, How can I symmetrically mesh a concrete cylinder. I am not able to come up with symmetric meshes on the top and bottom surfaces (please see the attached picture).
Thank you,
Hamid
hfakhri@buffalo.edu
Hi,
Here you have mentioned the swept meshing, How can I symmetrically mesh a concrete cylinder. I am not able to come up with symmetric meshes on the top and bottom surfaces (please see the attached picture).
Thank you,
Hamid
hfakhri@buffalo.edu
Jeff Hiller
COMSOL Employee
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
9 years ago
21 oct. 2015, 04:56 UTC−4
Hello Hamidreza,
If I understand what you want to achieve, this should work for you: divide the top face into two equal halves, and mesh those two halves with swept meshes (you get regular quad meshes), and then sweep that down.
If difficulties persist, or if the above is not clear, please contact support@comsol.com .
Best,
Jeff
Hello Hamidreza,
If I understand what you want to achieve, this should work for you: divide the top face into two equal halves, and mesh those two halves with swept meshes (you get regular quad meshes), and then sweep that down.
If difficulties persist, or if the above is not clear, please contact support@comsol.com .
Best,
Jeff