Hello Silvia Bersan
Your Discussion has gone 30 days without a reply. If you still need help with COMSOL and have an on-subscription license, please visit our Support Center for help.
If you do not hold an on-subscription license, you may find an answer in another Discussion or in the Knowledge Base.
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
11 sept. 2013, 10:53 UTC−4
I'm checking the theory of the Brinkman equation in the manual. There's a term I don't understand where stems from: 2/3nu(nabla u). I also checked the given references but this term is not metioned. Any clue?
Hi,
It's a viscous term which comes with the gradient of u and the transpose gradient.
In the classic Navier Stokes equation this term disappears because the divergence of u is zero.
Is it clear now?
[QUOTE]
I'm checking the theory of the Brinkman equation in the manual. There's a term I don't understand where stems from: 2/3nu(nabla u). I also checked the given references but this term is not metioned. Any clue?
[/QUOTE]
Hi,
It's a viscous term which comes with the gradient of u and the transpose gradient.
In the classic Navier Stokes equation this term disappears because the divergence of u is zero.
Is it clear now?