Menu

Discussion Forum

New Discussion
Filtrer

Note: This discussion is about an older version of the COMSOL Multiphysics® software. The information provided may be out of date.

Discussion Closed This discussion was created more than 6 months ago and has been closed. To start a new discussion with a link back to this one, click here.

Flow in a pipe with a very large aspect ratio

Posted 4 avr. 2013, 15:47 UTC−4 Fluid & Heat Version 4.3 5 Replies

Kyle Macfarlan
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

I'm trying to solve what should be a very simple problem as part of a larger project I'm working on. It's just laminar flow in a pipe of length 14,000 feet and radius 0.04 feet. I'm just trying to find the steady-state solution for now. The issue is that the inlet velocity is satisfied on the boundary, but rapidly decays to zero velocity. This is demonstrated in the attached image.

It's a 2-D axisymmetric model. Symmetry on the left boundary, wall on the right, inlet at the top and outlet at the bottom. The outlet is set to a zero pressure, and I have tried many different inlet boundary conditions. I started with a much smaller system, the same radius, but a length of only 8 ft which worked perfectly, but it's not working on the larger system. I feel like I'm missing something obvious.

Thanks!
Kyle

Attachments:

5 Replies Last Post 8 avr. 2013, 02:51 UTC−4
Ivar KJELBERG COMSOL Multiphysics(r) fan, retired, former "Senior Expert" at CSEM SA (CH)
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 4 avr. 2013, 17:01 UTC−4
Hi

I cannot tell why but in my opinion for that pipe size ratio, you should rather consider the Pipe flow module, as that one is made specifically for those kind of pipings

--
Good luck
Ivar
Hi I cannot tell why but in my opinion for that pipe size ratio, you should rather consider the Pipe flow module, as that one is made specifically for those kind of pipings -- Good luck Ivar
Nagi Elabbasi Facebook Reality Labs
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 5 avr. 2013, 11:39 UTC−4
Hi Kyle,

I had a similar problem with a high aspect ratio model and I switched to direct fully coupled solver and it worked. Try it out if you are currently using some form of iterative or segregated solver.

Nagi Elabbasi
Veryst Engineering
Hi Kyle, I had a similar problem with a high aspect ratio model and I switched to direct fully coupled solver and it worked. Try it out if you are currently using some form of iterative or segregated solver. Nagi Elabbasi Veryst Engineering
Kyle Macfarlan
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 5 avr. 2013, 15:31 UTC−4
I am using the direct, fully coupled solver. I'm pretty sure it's a mesh issue the more I look at it.
I am using the direct, fully coupled solver. I'm pretty sure it's a mesh issue the more I look at it.
Ivar KJELBERG COMSOL Multiphysics(r) fan, retired, former "Senior Expert" at CSEM SA (CH)
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 5 avr. 2013, 16:06 UTC−4
Hi

what kind of mesh do you use ?
I have notices that if you mesh the entry section correctly to resolve the parabola, then use a sweep mesh with even rather long elements, the results is quite OK in laminar mode, even when the aspect ration or rather poor. This is because once developed, the profile shape changes little e along the tube

--
Good luck
Ivar
Hi what kind of mesh do you use ? I have notices that if you mesh the entry section correctly to resolve the parabola, then use a sweep mesh with even rather long elements, the results is quite OK in laminar mode, even when the aspect ration or rather poor. This is because once developed, the profile shape changes little e along the tube -- Good luck Ivar
Niklas Rom COMSOL Employee

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 8 avr. 2013, 02:51 UTC−4
Chances are that there is something something fishy with one of your boundary conditions. Even if the mesh is poor, such a non-mass conserving solution should not be possible. But still guessing, since I have not seen your model.

I also agree with the previous posters: You should have a look at the Pipe Flow module for problems like this.

Kind regards
Niklas

Chances are that there is something something fishy with one of your boundary conditions. Even if the mesh is poor, such a non-mass conserving solution should not be possible. But still guessing, since I have not seen your model. I also agree with the previous posters: You should have a look at the Pipe Flow module for problems like this. Kind regards Niklas

Note that while COMSOL employees may participate in the discussion forum, COMSOL® software users who are on-subscription should submit their questions via the Support Center for a more comprehensive response from the Technical Support team.

Suggested Content