Menu

Discussion Forum

New Discussion
Filtrer

Discussion Closed This discussion was created more than 6 months ago and has been closed. To start a new discussion with a link back to this one, click here.

Convergence problem in RF module

Posted 1 avr. 2013, 07:16 UTC−4 Materials, Studies & Solvers Version 5.1 3 Replies

Debadrita Paria
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

I am doing some plasmonics simulation using silver nano particles in comsol. For silver particle convergence is either very very slow or there is no convergence in most cases for some specific wavelengths. The same model works fine for gold nano particles. Kindly help.
3 Replies Last Post 20 janv. 2017, 11:44 UTC−5
COMSOL Moderator

Hello Debadrita Paria

Your Discussion has gone 30 days without a reply. If you still need help with COMSOL and have an on-subscription license, please visit our Support Center for help.

If you do not hold an on-subscription license, you may find an answer in another Discussion or in the Knowledge Base.

Shuai Hou
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 23 sept. 2014, 23:11 UTC−4
Please try the direct solver instead of the iterative solver. I had exactly the same problem (extremely slow convergence at about 360 nm for a silver nanocrystal), and the direct solver worked perfectly.
Please try the direct solver instead of the iterative solver. I had exactly the same problem (extremely slow convergence at about 360 nm for a silver nanocrystal), and the direct solver worked perfectly.
Seojoo Lee
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 8 years ago 20 janv. 2017, 11:10 UTC−5
I was stuck in same problem.
Thanks for your comment. !
I was stuck in same problem. Thanks for your comment. !
Walter Frei COMSOL Employee

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 8 years ago 20 janv. 2017, 11:44 UTC−5
Hello All,

Having to use a direct solver is also often a sign that you've undermeshed the problem, especially in the silver material domains.
If you're dealing with a model that has lossy materials, please read:
www.comsol.com/blogs/modeling-of-materials-in-wave-electromagnetics-problems/
www.comsol.com/blogs/simulation-tools-for-solving-wave-electromagnetics-problems/

Meshing more finely may improve solution speed when using the iterative solver (and although a more finely meshed problem will use more memory, the iterative solver uses much less memory that the direct solver, so you generally come out ahead.)

Best Regards,
Hello All, Having to use a direct solver is also often a sign that you've undermeshed the problem, especially in the silver material domains. If you're dealing with a model that has lossy materials, please read: https://www.comsol.com/blogs/modeling-of-materials-in-wave-electromagnetics-problems/ https://www.comsol.com/blogs/simulation-tools-for-solving-wave-electromagnetics-problems/ Meshing more finely may improve solution speed when using the iterative solver (and although a more finely meshed problem will use more memory, the iterative solver uses much less memory that the direct solver, so you generally come out ahead.) Best Regards,

Note that while COMSOL employees may participate in the discussion forum, COMSOL® software users who are on-subscription should submit their questions via the Support Center for a more comprehensive response from the Technical Support team.

Suggested Content