Note: This discussion is about an older version of the COMSOL Multiphysics® software. The information provided may be out of date.
Discussion Closed This discussion was created more than 6 months ago and has been closed. To start a new discussion with a link back to this one, click here.
Electrostatics vs Electric Currents Interfaces. Something is wrong...
Posted 24 janv. 2013, 15:29 UTC−5 Low-Frequency Electromagnetics, Materials, Modeling Tools & Definitions, Parameters, Variables, & Functions Version 4.3a 3 Replies
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Hi everyone,
I mentioned this in an earlier post. I believe I have an inconsistency with the software (COMSOL Multiphysics Base Package). This may or may not be intended. When picking between the Electrostatics and Electric Currents Interfaces, I believe that the the basic functionality should be the same.
I have attached two different models of 3 copper "terminal" like objects in the middle of a relative insulator. I want to see the electric field and potential field mapped onto the geometry. One model uses the Electrostatics Interface and the other uses the Electric Currents Interface. Each model has a potential on the left terminal, ground on the right terminal, and nothing assigned to the middle terminal. Theoretically, the voltage should vary linearly from the potential to the ground with a little glitch in the linearity over the middle terminal. This is what the file "Electrostatics_ForumQuestion.png" file shows, which is the correct one. The other picture file "ElectricCurrents_ForumQuestion.png" shows an incorrect interpretation of the model (a non-linear change of the voltage with respect to the distance between the potential and grounded terminals). I have also included the corresponding Comsol model files for each one if you would like to see more.
Maybe I am missing something theoretically here. If these models do vary for some mathematical/physical reason (which I am obviously completely blind to :) ), could someone please explain to me why?
Thanks in advance for your time!
John
I mentioned this in an earlier post. I believe I have an inconsistency with the software (COMSOL Multiphysics Base Package). This may or may not be intended. When picking between the Electrostatics and Electric Currents Interfaces, I believe that the the basic functionality should be the same.
I have attached two different models of 3 copper "terminal" like objects in the middle of a relative insulator. I want to see the electric field and potential field mapped onto the geometry. One model uses the Electrostatics Interface and the other uses the Electric Currents Interface. Each model has a potential on the left terminal, ground on the right terminal, and nothing assigned to the middle terminal. Theoretically, the voltage should vary linearly from the potential to the ground with a little glitch in the linearity over the middle terminal. This is what the file "Electrostatics_ForumQuestion.png" file shows, which is the correct one. The other picture file "ElectricCurrents_ForumQuestion.png" shows an incorrect interpretation of the model (a non-linear change of the voltage with respect to the distance between the potential and grounded terminals). I have also included the corresponding Comsol model files for each one if you would like to see more.
Maybe I am missing something theoretically here. If these models do vary for some mathematical/physical reason (which I am obviously completely blind to :) ), could someone please explain to me why?
Thanks in advance for your time!
John
Attachments:
3 Replies Last Post 28 janv. 2013, 14:14 UTC−5