Discussion Closed This discussion was created more than 6 months ago and has been closed. To start a new discussion with a link back to this one, click here.

How to place a Point mass on COMSOL

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Good morning everyone,

Im currently working on a Eigenfrequency Prestressed study.

I want to put a point mass at the top face of the lower flexure (see the image below)

I attached another image that show where i want the point mass (see the image with the blue arrow).

For referance I attach the mph.file for the system that is used for the simulation and a image of what it look like.

Before I put a point mass I use a cube with a very high density with interia and placed it where arrow is at but it won't be useful for long term research, and before I use a point load but it have no mass of interia.

An idea that I have is to use a added mass load but it only for boundary but I am not sure it a correct substitute for the point mass.

Any help or advice much appreciated thank you.



2 Replies Last Post 15 mai 2024, 12:56 UTC−4
Henrik Sönnerlind COMSOL Employee

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 6 months ago 15 mai 2024, 06:37 UTC−4
Updated: 6 months ago 15 mai 2024, 06:45 UTC−4

There is no point mass feature in the Solid Mechanics interface. The reason is that a point mass causes a type of singularity, similar to a concentrated force. It is better to distribute the mass over some small boundary, using an Added Mass node.

You can also use a Rigid Connector with a Mass and Moment of Inertia subnode. Note that you can select a flexible formulation, if the constraints imposed by the rigid connector are too hard.

-------------------
Henrik Sönnerlind
COMSOL
There is no point mass feature in the Solid Mechanics interface. The reason is that a point mass causes a type of singularity, similar to a concentrated force. It is better to distribute the mass over some small boundary, using an **Added Mass** node. You can also use a **Rigid Connector** with a **Mass and Moment of Inertia** subnode. Note that you can select a flexible formulation, if the constraints imposed by the rigid connector are too hard.

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 6 months ago 15 mai 2024, 12:56 UTC−4

got it i will use an added mass boundary thank you very much!

got it i will use an added mass boundary thank you very much!

Note that while COMSOL employees may participate in the discussion forum, COMSOL® software users who are on-subscription should submit their questions via the Support Center for a more comprehensive response from the Technical Support team.