Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 year ago
20 juil. 2023, 13:02 UTC−4
Updated:
1 year ago
20 juil. 2023, 13:02 UTC−4
- You can see which domains are assigned to a material by clicking on the material name.
- Is the relative permittivity of liquid argon different from one??
1. You can see which domains are assigned to a material by clicking on the material name.
2. Is the relative permittivity of liquid argon different from one??
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 year ago
21 juil. 2023, 04:49 UTC−4
- You can see which domains are assigned to a material by clicking on the material name.
The domains seem to be correctly defined. The overriding of the materials also seem to be correct. I have attached the file with this reply. If you can take a look at it and help me figure out the mistake, I'd greatly appreciate the help
- Is the relative permittivity of liquid argon different from one??
Yes, it is 1.505. I changed it to 100 too, to see if it makes any difference. It didn't
>1. You can see which domains are assigned to a material by clicking on the material name.
> The domains seem to be correctly defined. The overriding of the materials also seem to be correct. I have attached the file with this reply. If you can take a look at it and help me figure out the mistake, I'd greatly appreciate the help
>2. Is the relative permittivity of liquid argon different from one??
Yes, it is 1.505. I changed it to 100 too, to see if it makes any difference. It didn't
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 year ago
21 juil. 2023, 16:46 UTC−4
I don't have the semicondutor module but in any case your posted file only has the electrostatic module active.
Under the Charge Conservation node you have selected User Defined for the permittivity and have assigned the same value to all regions. This overrides the material properties so any change to those will have no effect.
Further thoughts:
The argon domain has way more mesh elements than make sense.
This is a symmetric problem and can be reduced in size by a factor of 8.
I don't have the semicondutor module but in any case your posted file only has the electrostatic module active.
Under the Charge Conservation node you have selected User Defined for the permittivity and have assigned the same value to all regions. This overrides the material properties so any change to those will have no effect.
Further thoughts:
The argon domain has way more mesh elements than make sense.
This is a symmetric problem and can be reduced in size by a factor of 8.
Edgar J. Kaiser
Certified Consultant
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 year ago
22 juil. 2023, 13:57 UTC−4
Even if you change the permittivity, the field in the electrostatic model will not change with fixed potential boundaries.
-------------------
Edgar J. Kaiser
emPhys Physical Technology
www.emphys.com
Even if you change the permittivity, the field in the electrostatic model will not change with fixed potential boundaries.