Note: This discussion is about an older version of the COMSOL Multiphysics® software. The information provided may be out of date.

Discussion Closed This discussion was created more than 6 months ago and has been closed. To start a new discussion with a link back to this one, click here.

Shear rate discretization in "Two-phase flow modeling of a dense suspension" tutorial

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Hi,

in the tutorial "Two-phase flow modeling of a dense suspension" the shear rate is discretized as an additional equation "because the particle flux contains derivatives of this quantity, which in turn depends on the derivatives of the velocity".

I do not understand why, using this procedure, we gain in accuracy. For example, the Source term of the additional PDE is defined as "gamma-sqrt(0.5*(4*ux^2+2*(uy+vx)^2+4*vy^2)+eps)" which has in it the derivatives of u, meaning that gamma contains the derivatives of u as it should. Then gamma is gonna be derived in order to get the particle flux, hence leading to a double derivation of u as expected.
From here I do not see the advantage of defining an additional PDE, since the double derivation is anyway present.

Does anyone have an explanation for this approach?

Thanks, J

0 Replies Last Post 24 sept. 2012, 09:13 UTC−4
COMSOL Moderator

Hello J

Your Discussion has gone 30 days without a reply. If you still need help with COMSOL and have an on-subscription license, please visit our Support Center for help.

If you do not hold an on-subscription license, you may find an answer in another Discussion or in the Knowledge Base.

Note that while COMSOL employees may participate in the discussion forum, COMSOL® software users who are on-subscription should submit their questions via the Support Center for a more comprehensive response from the Technical Support team.