Menu

Discussion Forum

New Discussion
Filtrer

Note: This discussion is about an older version of the COMSOL Multiphysics® software. The information provided may be out of date.

Discussion Closed This discussion was created more than 6 months ago and has been closed. To start a new discussion with a link back to this one, click here.

inlet flow rate

Posted 11 sept. 2012, 13:54 UTC−4 Fluid & Heat, Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) Version 4.2a, Version 4.3 5 Replies

Abbie
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Hi,

Anyone knows how to implement "flow rate" as inlet boundary condition in FSI or fluid flow physics, where flow should come in as plug profile? It is noted that the inlet boundary is allowed to move horizontally (prescribed mesh displacement in z-axes=0) in 2D axisymmetric.

As far as I know, "flow rate" can be implemented as inlet boundary condition by selecting Inlet>"Laminar inflow>flow rate", however this laminar flow rate produces flows with parabolic profile at the inlet.

Any suggestion/ idea to implement inlet flow rate with plug profile, in a moving inlet boundary?


Thanks!



Abbie



5 Replies Last Post 12 sept. 2012, 03:57 UTC−4
Ivar KJELBERG COMSOL Multiphysics(r) fan, retired, former "Senior Expert" at CSEM SA (CH)
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 11 sept. 2012, 15:09 UTC−4
Hi

there is something I do not really follow in your explanations (but I'm no CFD specialist ;), for me "plugflow" is related to highly turbulent flow, while parabolic profiles is related to gentle laminar flow. So if you have any plug flow conditions, you should be in turbulent mode too then you can define also a constat input velocity, no ?

--
Good luck
Ivar
Hi there is something I do not really follow in your explanations (but I'm no CFD specialist ;), for me "plugflow" is related to highly turbulent flow, while parabolic profiles is related to gentle laminar flow. So if you have any plug flow conditions, you should be in turbulent mode too then you can define also a constat input velocity, no ? -- Good luck Ivar
Abbie
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 11 sept. 2012, 21:35 UTC−4
Hi Ivar,

The plug flow that I meant is a laminar plug (flat) profile, the fluid is in laminar flow but not yet fully developed into parabolic profile.
In COMSOL>Laminar Flow module, by selecting Inlet>"Velocity" produces laminar flat profile while Inlet>"Laminar inflow" produces laminar parabolic profile.
Hi Ivar, The plug flow that I meant is a laminar plug (flat) profile, the fluid is in laminar flow but not yet fully developed into parabolic profile. In COMSOL>Laminar Flow module, by selecting Inlet>"Velocity" produces laminar flat profile while Inlet>"Laminar inflow" produces laminar parabolic profile.
Ivar KJELBERG COMSOL Multiphysics(r) fan, retired, former "Senior Expert" at CSEM SA (CH)
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 12 sept. 2012, 03:02 UTC−4
Hi
You are right in laminar you have the two options, the only thing that I get often wrong, is that if you use the laminar inflow, and presure driven flow, COMSOL considers the pressure drop of the extra laminar inflow length, while I mostly forget that one, and want to consider the pressure at my true inlet.

But anyhow the parabolic shape comes very quickly (at least so far for my analysis), therefor I never consider a "plug flow" for laminar cases as this ony makes the solver take longer. But you might have a special fluid for which this flow case goes on for longer ...

But then I did not understand what is the problem to use a constant veocity input, in aminar case, it takes only longer to get the solver to converge, and often one must amp the velocity slowly to allow the solver to follow

--
Good luck
Ivar
Hi You are right in laminar you have the two options, the only thing that I get often wrong, is that if you use the laminar inflow, and presure driven flow, COMSOL considers the pressure drop of the extra laminar inflow length, while I mostly forget that one, and want to consider the pressure at my true inlet. But anyhow the parabolic shape comes very quickly (at least so far for my analysis), therefor I never consider a "plug flow" for laminar cases as this ony makes the solver take longer. But you might have a special fluid for which this flow case goes on for longer ... But then I did not understand what is the problem to use a constant veocity input, in aminar case, it takes only longer to get the solver to converge, and often one must amp the velocity slowly to allow the solver to follow -- Good luck Ivar
Abbie
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 12 sept. 2012, 03:29 UTC−4
Hi

I noticed that flow profile is affecting the flow phenomena result that I am investigating, therefore i have to implement laminar flat profile instead of laminar parabolic profile. In my case, the total inflow volume is a constant while I have a moving (expanding) inlet boundary. If using velocity as inlet boundary condition, together with a moving inlet, the flow rate obtained would be exceed the desired constant volume.

I guess I can use an equation (velocity=flow rate/ inlet area) in the Inlet>"Velocity" to conserved the flow rate while having a laminar flat profile flow. However I am not sure how to determine the area of inlet as it is only set to move freely in horizontal axes (prescribed mesh displacment, dz=0) in 2D axisymmetry.
Hi I noticed that flow profile is affecting the flow phenomena result that I am investigating, therefore i have to implement laminar flat profile instead of laminar parabolic profile. In my case, the total inflow volume is a constant while I have a moving (expanding) inlet boundary. If using velocity as inlet boundary condition, together with a moving inlet, the flow rate obtained would be exceed the desired constant volume. I guess I can use an equation (velocity=flow rate/ inlet area) in the Inlet>"Velocity" to conserved the flow rate while having a laminar flat profile flow. However I am not sure how to determine the area of inlet as it is only set to move freely in horizontal axes (prescribed mesh displacment, dz=0) in 2D axisymmetry.
Amir Fadel
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 12 sept. 2012, 03:57 UTC−4
Hi,

You'd better to use an expression involving the local variable s, which ranges from 0 to 1 following the direction of the boundary.

So if you have a 2D-axisymmetric geometry, you may write an expression like Uin = Umax *(s^(1/a) - 1/a*s)

where Umax is the maximum velocity of your flow, and a is a constant which determines how steep your plug flow is. For example a turbulent flow may be approximated by a=7, so I would say that it is a good starting point for a developing velocity profile.

Cheers
Hi, You'd better to use an expression involving the local variable s, which ranges from 0 to 1 following the direction of the boundary. So if you have a 2D-axisymmetric geometry, you may write an expression like Uin = Umax *(s^(1/a) - 1/a*s) where Umax is the maximum velocity of your flow, and a is a constant which determines how steep your plug flow is. For example a turbulent flow may be approximated by a=7, so I would say that it is a good starting point for a developing velocity profile. Cheers

Note that while COMSOL employees may participate in the discussion forum, COMSOL® software users who are on-subscription should submit their questions via the Support Center for a more comprehensive response from the Technical Support team.

Suggested Content