Menu

Discussion Forum

New Discussion
Filtrer

Note: This discussion is about an older version of the COMSOL Multiphysics® software. The information provided may be out of date.

Discussion Closed This discussion was created more than 6 months ago and has been closed. To start a new discussion with a link back to this one, click here.

Increasing local mesh density with second block

Posted 10 août 2012, 09:16 UTC−4 Low-Frequency Electromagnetics, Mesh, Modeling Tools & Definitions, Parameters, Variables, & Functions Version 4.0a 2 Replies

Stephen Cross
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Hi,

Just a quick question regarding how legitimate a technique I've used is.

I'm modelling magnets and want to plot the force as a function of distance from the magnets. I've already got this working and have got my 1D force plot; however, it's not as smooth as I'd have liked. I know I can improve this by increasing the overall mesh density in my air sphere. I was wondering if it's legitimate for me to use a second box (a very narrow box, which runs the length of the distance over which I'm measuring), as this increases the local mesh density in the area I'm interested in. The second box I've used is filled with air, as this is what is in the larger sphere I'm performing the simulation in.

The force curve I got doing this looks exactly as I'd like (i.e. very smooth), but I just wanted to check this is an acceptable way of increasing mesh density.

Any advice on this would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks
Stephen
2 Replies Last Post 11 août 2012, 09:37 UTC−4
Ivar KJELBERG COMSOL Multiphysics(r) fan, retired, former "Senior Expert" at CSEM SA (CH)
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 11 août 2012, 03:28 UTC−4
Hi

the force calcuations are derived from field gradients, so if your local meshing denisty is made higher where it counts it will improve, but you need a reasonable mesh density outside this local region too, else the field is poorly resolved at the boundary of the region of higher mesh density.
My suggestion is to run once with twice as dense mesh (everywhere) and se how the result change, not only the "smoothness" but also the absolute value(s) field

--
Good luck
Ivar
Hi the force calcuations are derived from field gradients, so if your local meshing denisty is made higher where it counts it will improve, but you need a reasonable mesh density outside this local region too, else the field is poorly resolved at the boundary of the region of higher mesh density. My suggestion is to run once with twice as dense mesh (everywhere) and se how the result change, not only the "smoothness" but also the absolute value(s) field -- Good luck Ivar
Stephen Cross
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 11 août 2012, 09:37 UTC−4
Thank you for the response. I shall give this a go.

Stephen
Thank you for the response. I shall give this a go. Stephen

Note that while COMSOL employees may participate in the discussion forum, COMSOL® software users who are on-subscription should submit their questions via the Support Center for a more comprehensive response from the Technical Support team.

Suggested Content