Discussion Closed This discussion was created more than 6 months ago and has been closed. To start a new discussion with a link back to this one, click here.
to avoid inverted mesh elements
Posted 5 déc. 2021, 06:18 UTC−5 8 Replies
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
In 2D, how to avoid inverted mesh elements? Would triangular or rectangular meshing matter?
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
This usually is due to a problematic geometry. If you can, edit your geometry to specify all the boundaries, inside and out, without any extremely thin pieces or nearly-tangent lines, etc. Consider posting your model (.mph file) to the forum if you want more specific help.
-------------------Scientific Applications & Research Associates (SARA) Inc.
www.comsol.com/partners-consultants/certified-consultants/sara
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Thanks Dr Koslover, all I use is just a domain of a square. Is that a poor geometry?
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Hm, a square gives you inverted elements?
-------------------Edgar J. Kaiser
emPhys Physical Technology
www.emphys.com
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
at least as far as what the warning message says, though a glance of the deformed square doesn't show obvious inverted elements
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
I suggest you post your model (the .mph file) to the forum.
-------------------Scientific Applications & Research Associates (SARA) Inc.
www.comsol.com/partners-consultants/certified-consultants/sara
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Most strangely, the warning suggest inverted elements near coordinate (1e5,1e5) while the domain size is only about 1*1.
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
I assume that this happens during solution, and not in the initial configuration.
It seems that you have an ill-posed problem where, for example, a solid mechanics model 'blows up'. Such problems are, for example, common with some hyperelastic models that are not unconditionally stable. For an even more common and unexpected case, see the section about linear elasticity under geometric nonlinearity in https://www.comsol.com/blogs/modeling-linear-elastic-materials-how-difficult-can-it-be/ .
-------------------Henrik Sönnerlind
COMSOL
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
I assume that this happens during solution, and not in the initial configuration.
It seems that you have an ill-posed problem where, for example, a solid mechanics model 'blows up'. Such problems are, for example, common with some hyperelastic models that are not unconditionally stable. For an even more common and unexpected case, see the section about linear elasticity under geometric nonlinearity in .
Thank you! However, though the warning suggests inverted elements near coordinate (1e5,1e5), the domain (1*1) after the computation looks normal in shape rather than sth that blows up and the whole computation is completed without error messages.
Note that while COMSOL employees may participate in the discussion forum, COMSOL® software users who are on-subscription should submit their questions via the Support Center for a more comprehensive response from the Technical Support team.
Suggested Content
- KNOWLEDGE BASE What Does Degrees of Freedom (DOFs) Mean in COMSOL Multiphysics?
- KNOWLEDGE BASE Setup and Meshing of Infinite Elements, Perfectly Matched Layers, and Absorbing Layers
- FORUM inverted mesh elements
- BLOG Improved Capabilities for Meshing with Tetrahedral Elements
- KNOWLEDGE BASE Failed to respect edge element on geometry edge