Menu

Discussion Forum

New Discussion
Filtrer

Note: This discussion is about an older version of the COMSOL Multiphysics® software. The information provided may be out of date.

Discussion Closed This discussion was created more than 6 months ago and has been closed. To start a new discussion with a link back to this one, click here.

Quasi-Static or Inertial Terms

Posted 21 mars 2012, 08:31 UTC−4 Version 4.2a 3 Replies

Delwar
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Dear moderator and COMSOL user,
I built up a model for time dependent analysis of Structural mechancis module of COMSOL 4.2a. I am more interested to see the time dependance behavior of this piezo. When I compute the time dependent study, it is working but the pressure in the Ti does not changing with time(for 1D plot).
In the structural transient behavior of Piezo Devices, there are Quasi-static and Include inertial terms. When I select the ''Quasi-static'', the simulation results for pressure or displacement of PZT doesn't changnig with time(shows const. value) but for ''include inertial terms'' , it is changing with time.

What should I select to see the change of pressure or displacement of PZT with time for 1D Plots?


Regards
D Bhuyan


3 Replies Last Post 15 avr. 2012, 04:15 UTC−4
Ivar KJELBERG COMSOL Multiphysics(r) fan, retired, former "Senior Expert" at CSEM SA (CH)
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 21 mars 2012, 14:04 UTC−4
Hi

check the equations of your physics when you turn on and off the inertial terms, you wil lsee the d^_u_/dt^2 term drops out, then check how this influences the pressure term

Nromally it's better to use the inertial terms if you look for the transient response, the only thing is that you need then to have smooth and coherent initial conditions, else you get large transient ringings that might mask your effects, or the del might just not converge

--
Good luck
Ivar
Hi check the equations of your physics when you turn on and off the inertial terms, you wil lsee the d^_u_/dt^2 term drops out, then check how this influences the pressure term Nromally it's better to use the inertial terms if you look for the transient response, the only thing is that you need then to have smooth and coherent initial conditions, else you get large transient ringings that might mask your effects, or the del might just not converge -- Good luck Ivar
Delwar
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 12 avr. 2012, 20:19 UTC−4
Dear User,
I am interested to see the transient behaviour of thesimulation model. For example, If I apply electrical potential in the piezo and time range(0 to 400us, stepsize 1us). 1) How can I define the variable for transient analysis of piezo?
2) How can I build up the PZT response for simply pulse excitation? I have attached the model for your consideration.

Please give me a feedback.

Thanks
D Bhuyan
Dear User, I am interested to see the transient behaviour of thesimulation model. For example, If I apply electrical potential in the piezo and time range(0 to 400us, stepsize 1us). 1) How can I define the variable for transient analysis of piezo? 2) How can I build up the PZT response for simply pulse excitation? I have attached the model for your consideration. Please give me a feedback. Thanks D Bhuyan

Attachments:

Ivar KJELBERG COMSOL Multiphysics(r) fan, retired, former "Senior Expert" at CSEM SA (CH)
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 15 avr. 2012, 04:15 UTC−4
Hi

the include inertial terms, adds (keep) the "rho*d^2 _u_ / dt^2" term in the equation, you have all transient behaviour, including the ringing from any inconsistent initial conditions w.r.t. to the steady state at solving start

in your case I'm not sure what to use as I do not fully uderstand your model, the fixyed part of the PZT seems bizarre for me as its the domain that should deform, and I do not see any time varying voltage, only a 100V steady state, which from the "0" initial conditions gives a "bang" hence ringing with the inertial terms, which dissapear if you remove the inertial terms, but this is the same as a statonary case.

aanother thing your puls/rect defined is symmetric (plot it to check), so you need to use an time offset when you call it to start at "0" and get the pulse in the positive time domain (i.e. "V=100[V]*Pulse((t-2*Pulse_hw)[1/s])

Finally do not forget to use an "intermittent" or "strict" time stepping, and choose a smaller time (i.e.0.1[us]) step if you include the inertial terms as its ringing at quite a high frequency ;)

--
Good luck
Ivar
Hi the include inertial terms, adds (keep) the "rho*d^2 _u_ / dt^2" term in the equation, you have all transient behaviour, including the ringing from any inconsistent initial conditions w.r.t. to the steady state at solving start in your case I'm not sure what to use as I do not fully uderstand your model, the fixyed part of the PZT seems bizarre for me as its the domain that should deform, and I do not see any time varying voltage, only a 100V steady state, which from the "0" initial conditions gives a "bang" hence ringing with the inertial terms, which dissapear if you remove the inertial terms, but this is the same as a statonary case. aanother thing your puls/rect defined is symmetric (plot it to check), so you need to use an time offset when you call it to start at "0" and get the pulse in the positive time domain (i.e. "V=100[V]*Pulse((t-2*Pulse_hw)[1/s]) Finally do not forget to use an "intermittent" or "strict" time stepping, and choose a smaller time (i.e.0.1[us]) step if you include the inertial terms as its ringing at quite a high frequency ;) -- Good luck Ivar

Note that while COMSOL employees may participate in the discussion forum, COMSOL® software users who are on-subscription should submit their questions via the Support Center for a more comprehensive response from the Technical Support team.

Suggested Content