Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
2 mars 2012, 17:49 UTC−5
I did so by writing like this:
real(f)
imag(f)
where f is the desired function. For example, in my work, I wanted to plot a function which was frequency- dependant. But, I just needed to plot the real part. So I defined it as above in Global Expressions and plotted it easily!
I did so by writing like this:
real(f)
imag(f)
where f is the desired function. For example, in my work, I wanted to plot a function which was frequency- dependant. But, I just needed to plot the real part. So I defined it as above in Global Expressions and plotted it easily!
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
2 mars 2012, 17:52 UTC−5
Thanks for ur reply!
But I don't get ur point... I mean define a function from complex data.
Thanks for ur reply!
But I don't get ur point... I mean define a function from complex data.
Ivar KJELBERG
COMSOL Multiphysics(r) fan, retired, former "Senior Expert" at CSEM SA (CH)
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
3 mars 2012, 05:03 UTC−5
Hi
you can always enter the ral and complex part separately and combine tem in the equations or with an anlytical function (do not forget to turn on the "can produce Complex data from real arguments)
Test it out with a simple eample to be 100% convinced ;)
I believe it worked also like that in 3.5
--
Good luck
Ivar
Hi
you can always enter the ral and complex part separately and combine tem in the equations or with an anlytical function (do not forget to turn on the "can produce Complex data from real arguments)
Test it out with a simple eample to be 100% convinced ;)
I believe it worked also like that in 3.5
--
Good luck
Ivar
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
3 mars 2012, 06:39 UTC−5
Thanks, Ivar!
I think this is the way to get around the problem.
Thanks, Ivar!
I think this is the way to get around the problem.