Menu

Discussion Forum

New Discussion
Filtrer

Discussion Closed This discussion was created more than 6 months ago and has been closed. To start a new discussion with a link back to this one, click here.

Can I use COMSOL to solve this?

Posted 16 févr. 2012, 14:03 UTC−5 4 Replies

Mads Sondergard
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

I got a set of coupled PDEs where one of them reads:

dv/dt + v*dv/dx +dp/dx = 0

It is hard to see how the "Coefficient Form PDE" can inplement the "v*dv/dx +dp/dx" part. Any suggestions?
4 Replies Last Post 17 févr. 2012, 09:23 UTC−5
Murali Venkatraman
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 17 févr. 2012, 01:43 UTC−5
Why don't you use the general form ?
Why don't you use the general form ?
Francois Gregoire
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 17 févr. 2012, 08:26 UTC−5
have you tried to put dp/dx as the source term 'f' in the coefficient form? Correct me if I'm wrong: source term can be anything, the Comsol solver will deal with it.
have you tried to put dp/dx as the source term 'f' in the coefficient form? Correct me if I'm wrong: source term can be anything, the Comsol solver will deal with it.
Mads Sondergard
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 17 févr. 2012, 09:18 UTC−5
Hi Murali, I can't see how that would change things... the general form should just be the compact version of the Coefficient Form PDE.
Hi Murali, I can't see how that would change things... the general form should just be the compact version of the Coefficient Form PDE.
Mads Sondergard
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 17 févr. 2012, 09:23 UTC−5
Ah, I think I get what you are saying is that I should rewrite things like:

dv/dt + v*dv/dx +dp/dx = 0 ==>

1/v * dv/dt + dv/dx = -1/v * dp/dx ==>

1/v * dv/dt + dv/dx = -K/v , where: dp/dx = K

So I just add another equation! Well I think this trick should work.
Thanks Francois.
Ah, I think I get what you are saying is that I should rewrite things like: dv/dt + v*dv/dx +dp/dx = 0 ==> 1/v * dv/dt + dv/dx = -1/v * dp/dx ==> 1/v * dv/dt + dv/dx = -K/v , where: dp/dx = K So I just add another equation! Well I think this trick should work. Thanks Francois.

Note that while COMSOL employees may participate in the discussion forum, COMSOL® software users who are on-subscription should submit their questions via the Support Center for a more comprehensive response from the Technical Support team.

Suggested Content