Menu

Discussion Forum

New Discussion
Filtrer

Note: This discussion is about an older version of the COMSOL Multiphysics® software. The information provided may be out of date.

Discussion Closed This discussion was created more than 6 months ago and has been closed. To start a new discussion with a link back to this one, click here.

Stability in a Rotating Machinery models

Posted 30 janv. 2012, 14:17 UTC−5 Version 4.2, Version 4.2a 3 Replies

John R Puentes
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

I am running a model in the rotating machinery module of COMSOL. Anytime I increase the time of my model, I am obtaining different answers. Does anybody know if the rotating machinery models become stable in some point, or because of the rotational nature, there is always a time dependency?


Thanks
3 Replies Last Post 11 févr. 2012, 04:24 UTC−5
Ivar KJELBERG COMSOL Multiphysics(r) fan, retired, former "Senior Expert" at CSEM SA (CH)
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 30 janv. 2012, 15:09 UTC−5
Hi
I'm not sure I fully understand your question. If you have a rotary model, as time goes on the geometry will "rotate" and if you have put accelerating loads on it it will even turn faster and faster, until your time stepping might interact with the process, as you need several time steps per 2*pi rotation to resolve the displacements correctly

--
Good luck
Ivar
Hi I'm not sure I fully understand your question. If you have a rotary model, as time goes on the geometry will "rotate" and if you have put accelerating loads on it it will even turn faster and faster, until your time stepping might interact with the process, as you need several time steps per 2*pi rotation to resolve the displacements correctly -- Good luck Ivar
Trevor Munroe
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 10 févr. 2012, 22:46 UTC−5
I ran into a similar problem. This is because as you increase your time the time steps under free time stepping option become larger and this has a tendency of changing your results. My recommendation is to fix your maximum time step or control your time steps using the strict option.
I ran into a similar problem. This is because as you increase your time the time steps under free time stepping option become larger and this has a tendency of changing your results. My recommendation is to fix your maximum time step or control your time steps using the strict option.
Ivar KJELBERG COMSOL Multiphysics(r) fan, retired, former "Senior Expert" at CSEM SA (CH)
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 11 févr. 2012, 04:24 UTC−5
Hi
Indeed one need to study in detail the solver log for time steppings, there one sees when COMSOl calculates and when it interpolates to give your solution, if you have severa "out" following each other without any calculation steps in between, you should ask yourself how the solution (and your input BCs) is expected to change in between these 2 solver steps, if you expect an assymptotical endency towards a given result, then it's mostly OK, if your BC or output is expected to oscillate in between, then mstly the results are wrong, as the COMSOL interpolation of the two (or more for higher order fitting) last points will not give a representative results. Then the "Free" (default automatic) time stepping should be changed to "intermediate" (at least one solver sequence in between all your prescribed points) or "strict" at least solving at youre time steps, perhaps also (if solvers not happy with the convergence) in betwen, in addition

--
Good luck
Ivar
Hi Indeed one need to study in detail the solver log for time steppings, there one sees when COMSOl calculates and when it interpolates to give your solution, if you have severa "out" following each other without any calculation steps in between, you should ask yourself how the solution (and your input BCs) is expected to change in between these 2 solver steps, if you expect an assymptotical endency towards a given result, then it's mostly OK, if your BC or output is expected to oscillate in between, then mstly the results are wrong, as the COMSOL interpolation of the two (or more for higher order fitting) last points will not give a representative results. Then the "Free" (default automatic) time stepping should be changed to "intermediate" (at least one solver sequence in between all your prescribed points) or "strict" at least solving at youre time steps, perhaps also (if solvers not happy with the convergence) in betwen, in addition -- Good luck Ivar

Note that while COMSOL employees may participate in the discussion forum, COMSOL® software users who are on-subscription should submit their questions via the Support Center for a more comprehensive response from the Technical Support team.

Suggested Content