Ivar KJELBERG
COMSOL Multiphysics(r) fan, retired, former "Senior Expert" at CSEM SA (CH)
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
12 janv. 2010, 14:00 UTC−5
Hi
To now I have never taken COSMOL yet to show a wrong display values, but a couple of times I noticed that I got fooled by a few extreme points.
Have you done a boundary Z plot direct on the lower surface , with min max display on boundaries ?
What I iften use is to play with the scale gain, auto adjsut to everything min max found, by setting a limited value you can reduce the displayed values.
Your case seems to be very smooth and regular.
sometimes displaying w*(w>limit) allows you to pintpoint also certain regions
Hope this can help
Good luck
Ivar
PS which version are you using ?
Hi
To now I have never taken COSMOL yet to show a wrong display values, but a couple of times I noticed that I got fooled by a few extreme points.
Have you done a boundary Z plot direct on the lower surface , with min max display on boundaries ?
What I iften use is to play with the scale gain, auto adjsut to everything min max found, by setting a limited value you can reduce the displayed values.
Your case seems to be very smooth and regular.
sometimes displaying w*(w>limit) allows you to pintpoint also certain regions
Hope this can help
Good luck
Ivar
PS which version are you using ?
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
12 janv. 2010, 14:41 UTC−5
Ivar,
Thanks for your reply.
I took a line plot (XZ) on the lower surface and the value I get match the values on the colorbar. However, limited values of 'w' do not seem to change the 3D/2D display plots. I'm using version 3.4.
Rahul
Ivar,
Thanks for your reply.
I took a line plot (XZ) on the lower surface and the value I get match the values on the colorbar. However, limited values of 'w' do not seem to change the 3D/2D display plots. I'm using version 3.4.
Rahul
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
12 janv. 2010, 17:06 UTC−5
Not sure if this applies here but this might be due to numerical error arising from need to compute with very small numbers: You are trying to resolve microns in SI system (1e-6m). It might help to rescale your problem, go to a different built in unit system (CGS?) or use a non-dimensional representation. I remember encountering a similar issue although it was in a different type of problem.
hope this helps
Ivar,
Thanks for your reply.
I took a line plot (XZ) on the lower surface and the value I get match the values on the colorbar. However, limited values of 'w' do not seem to change the 3D/2D display plots. I'm using version 3.4.
Rahul
Not sure if this applies here but this might be due to numerical error arising from need to compute with very small numbers: You are trying to resolve microns in SI system (1e-6m). It might help to rescale your problem, go to a different built in unit system (CGS?) or use a non-dimensional representation. I remember encountering a similar issue although it was in a different type of problem.
hope this helps
[QUOTE]
Ivar,
Thanks for your reply.
I took a line plot (XZ) on the lower surface and the value I get match the values on the colorbar. However, limited values of 'w' do not seem to change the 3D/2D display plots. I'm using version 3.4.
Rahul
[/QUOTE]
Ivar KJELBERG
COMSOL Multiphysics(r) fan, retired, former "Senior Expert" at CSEM SA (CH)
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
13 janv. 2010, 01:22 UTC−5
Hi
By comparing your two jpg I see the same value !,
your sag is negatif so its in the "blue" lower part of the color bar that you have -2.4e-5=-25e-6=-25um.
I have been cought a couple of times expecting to read on the top and not from the bottom, is it simply that ?
By the way you can always have your 3D graphs in um too, you have the choice of the units, just underneath the variable in the postprocessing plot window
Good éluck
Ivar
Hi
By comparing your two jpg I see the same value !,
your sag is negatif so its in the "blue" lower part of the color bar that you have -2.4e-5=-25e-6=-25um.
I have been cought a couple of times expecting to read on the top and not from the bottom, is it simply that ?
By the way you can always have your 3D graphs in um too, you have the choice of the units, just underneath the variable in the postprocessing plot window
Good éluck
Ivar