Menu

Discussion Forum

New Discussion
Filtrer

Discussion Closed This discussion was created more than 6 months ago and has been closed. To start a new discussion with a link back to this one, click here.

Electrostatics vs. electric currents?

Posted 5 mars 2020, 05:27 UTC−5 Low-Frequency Electromagnetics Version 5.1 3 Replies

Anna Kashkanova
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Hello, I am trying to simulate the electric field inside of a nanochannel filled the water using 2D geometry. The field results from three parallel electrodes (one with applied potential and another two with ground) embedded inside a glass substrate below the channel.

My first idea was to solve a poisson equation using electrostatics in COMSOL. I checked that I get the correct result for a problem I can solve analytically - if the nanochannel was also filled with glass. Then I fill with channel with water and get a resultant electric field.

However, then I realized that water is significantly more conductive than glass, so maybe I should use current conservation equations (electric currents). This gives me a completely different magnitude and shape of electric field, though again for a simple problem of channel filled with glass the results are the same as what I get from electrostatics.

I realize the difference comes from boundary conditions at the water/glass interface, but I am not sure which way gives the correct result.

I attach my simulation file.

Thank you for any advice.

3 Replies Last Post 5 mars 2020, 09:43 UTC−5
Edgar J. Kaiser Certified Consultant
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 5 years ago 5 mars 2020, 06:03 UTC−5

Anna,

it is not the boundary between water and glass that causes the difference but the different electrical conductivity of the materials. I think the ec-approach is the correct one. Electrical conductivity must be taken into account because it is by orders of magnitude different in the two materials.

Cheers Edgar

-------------------
Edgar J. Kaiser
emPhys Physical Technology
www.emphys.com
Anna, it is not the boundary between water and glass that causes the difference but the different electrical conductivity of the materials. I think the ec-approach is the correct one. Electrical conductivity must be taken into account because it is by orders of magnitude different in the two materials. Cheers Edgar
Anna Kashkanova
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 5 years ago 5 mars 2020, 09:23 UTC−5

Dear Edgar, Thank you, that makes sense! Does that mean that I choose between ES and EC approach depending on how much do to permettivities and conductivities vary between materials in the model? What if there is a situation if both vary similarly? Do you know if there is a way to account for both permettivities and conductivities? Best wishes, Anna

Dear Edgar, Thank you, that makes sense! Does that mean that I choose between ES and EC approach depending on how much do to permettivities and conductivities vary between materials in the model? What if there is a situation if both vary similarly? Do you know if there is a way to account for both permettivities and conductivities? Best wishes, Anna
Edgar J. Kaiser Certified Consultant
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 5 years ago 5 mars 2020, 09:43 UTC−5

EC takes both into account while ES ignores conductivity.

-------------------
Edgar J. Kaiser
emPhys Physical Technology
www.emphys.com
EC takes both into account while ES ignores conductivity.

Note that while COMSOL employees may participate in the discussion forum, COMSOL® software users who are on-subscription should submit their questions via the Support Center for a more comprehensive response from the Technical Support team.

Suggested Content