Menu

Discussion Forum

New Discussion
Filtrer

Note: This discussion is about an older version of the COMSOL Multiphysics® software. The information provided may be out of date.

Discussion Closed This discussion was created more than 6 months ago and has been closed. To start a new discussion with a link back to this one, click here.

Error linking Heat Transfer in Fluids and Turbulent Flow (Spalart-Allmaras)

Posted 18 avr. 2011, 16:20 UTC−4 Heat Transfer & Phase Change, Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD), Studies & Solvers Version 4.1 10 Replies

Daniel Bateman
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

I am using COMSOL Class Kit 4.1 to model a pretty simple flow of hot air in a vertical pipe. I was able to get the model to working using Laminar flow (all are steady state studies) and the Heat Transfer in Liquids physics, but I get this error in trying to get the turbulent physics to work: Constraint found for variables in different Segregated groups. Try to merge these groups.

I disabled the Laminar Physics before adding the Turbulent module and I am using separate studies under the same model.

How do I merge the constraints or other wise troubleshoot this error???

Thank You.
10 Replies Last Post 4 mai 2013, 03:05 UTC−4
Ivar KJELBERG COMSOL Multiphysics(r) fan, retired, former "Senior Expert" at CSEM SA (CH)
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 18 avr. 2011, 16:45 UTC−4
Hi

you can go into the solver segregated nodes and group the default two (or more) groups into one, manually, by adding the parameters to the first group and then deleting the second, once all variables have been transferred. That is what COMSOL proposes by such a message, I have tried a few times, and it sometimes works

--
Good luck
Ivar
Hi you can go into the solver segregated nodes and group the default two (or more) groups into one, manually, by adding the parameters to the first group and then deleting the second, once all variables have been transferred. That is what COMSOL proposes by such a message, I have tried a few times, and it sometimes works -- Good luck Ivar
Daniel Bateman
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 19 avr. 2011, 17:20 UTC−4
Thanks, doing that seems to have moved the calulations closer to a solution BUT

now I get: Undefined value found.
- Detail: NaN_or_Inf_found_when_solving_linear_system_using_SOR

I assume there is now an illegal opeations occuring, but how to I resolve this error??

Thanks Again..
Thanks, doing that seems to have moved the calulations closer to a solution BUT now I get: Undefined value found. - Detail: NaN_or_Inf_found_when_solving_linear_system_using_SOR I assume there is now an illegal opeations occuring, but how to I resolve this error?? Thanks Again..
Ivar KJELBERG COMSOL Multiphysics(r) fan, retired, former "Senior Expert" at CSEM SA (CH)
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 20 avr. 2011, 00:53 UTC−4
Hi

Thats tougher, perhaps something like a 1/0 in the equations somewhere. Do not forget that often variables are fields f(x,y,z) and are mapped on the mesh elements via their locations x,y,z hence you can get easily some singularities

--
Good luck
Ivar
Hi Thats tougher, perhaps something like a 1/0 in the equations somewhere. Do not forget that often variables are fields f(x,y,z) and are mapped on the mesh elements via their locations x,y,z hence you can get easily some singularities -- Good luck Ivar
Daniel Bateman
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 21 avr. 2011, 11:31 UTC−4
So I tried a new approach and attempted to recreate my model from scratch using the Conjugate Heat Transfer-Low Re K-E physics model rather than linking the separate HT and Turbulent physics.

BUT

I am not able to select any part of my geometry in the Turbulent portion of the Conjugate module in order to set my inlet, outlet, and wall conditions. I am able to select geometry to set a heat transfer boundary (set temperature), but noting for the fluids side. Is there a work around for this or some kind of unique procedure required to model in the conjugate physics???

Thank You,
Brett
So I tried a new approach and attempted to recreate my model from scratch using the Conjugate Heat Transfer-Low Re K-E physics model rather than linking the separate HT and Turbulent physics. BUT I am not able to select any part of my geometry in the Turbulent portion of the Conjugate module in order to set my inlet, outlet, and wall conditions. I am able to select geometry to set a heat transfer boundary (set temperature), but noting for the fluids side. Is there a work around for this or some kind of unique procedure required to model in the conjugate physics??? Thank You, Brett
Ivar KJELBERG COMSOL Multiphysics(r) fan, retired, former "Senior Expert" at CSEM SA (CH)
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 21 avr. 2011, 13:10 UTC−4
Hi

that's bizarre, I can select external boundaries and apply inlet, outlets ... under the physics Laminar as well as Turbulent Flow branch (depending on turbulent switch settings) are you in the latest patch 3 ? v4.1.0.185 ? could that be it ?, in case see the main web site "Support Product updates"

--
Good luck
Ivar
Hi that's bizarre, I can select external boundaries and apply inlet, outlets ... under the physics Laminar as well as Turbulent Flow branch (depending on turbulent switch settings) are you in the latest patch 3 ? v4.1.0.185 ? could that be it ?, in case see the main web site "Support Product updates" -- Good luck Ivar
Daniel Bateman
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 28 avr. 2011, 10:47 UTC−4
Hi,

Okay I fixed the boundary selection problem (it was me, not COMSOL), but now that I have a resonable looking solution from the Conjugate HT/Low Re k-E module I keep getting this warning:

New constraint force nodes detected: these are not stored !

Are these Reynolds stresses and/or does 'new' refer to succsesive iterations of the GMRES or somethig?

I can't tell how to interept the impact of this warning on the solution generated.

Any ideas?

Thank You!
Hi, Okay I fixed the boundary selection problem (it was me, not COMSOL), but now that I have a resonable looking solution from the Conjugate HT/Low Re k-E module I keep getting this warning: New constraint force nodes detected: these are not stored ! Are these Reynolds stresses and/or does 'new' refer to succsesive iterations of the GMRES or somethig? I can't tell how to interept the impact of this warning on the solution generated. Any ideas? Thank You!
Ivar KJELBERG COMSOL Multiphysics(r) fan, retired, former "Senior Expert" at CSEM SA (CH)
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 28 avr. 2011, 11:20 UTC−4
Hi

I believe that is linked to the ALE (do you use ALE), from my understanding its not the most critical warning, could imply lower precision on some of the flux calulations

--
Good luck
Ivar
Hi I believe that is linked to the ALE (do you use ALE), from my understanding its not the most critical warning, could imply lower precision on some of the flux calulations -- Good luck Ivar
Richa Kumari
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 18 sept. 2011, 01:57 UTC−4
thanku you Ivar.it helped me..
thanku you Ivar.it helped me..
Hamad Aziz
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 3 mai 2013, 19:02 UTC−4

Hi

you can go into the solver segregated nodes and group the default two (or more) groups into one, manually, by adding the parameters to the first group and then deleting the second, once all variables have been transferred. That is what COMSOL proposes by such a message, I have tried a few times, and it sometimes works

--
Good luck
Ivar


Hi,

I am having problem with segregated solvers as well, but what you suggested, doesn't that defeat the purpose of using segregated solvers? if you put all the parameters to a single group than that would make it a (kind of) fully coupled?

Thanks
[QUOTE] Hi you can go into the solver segregated nodes and group the default two (or more) groups into one, manually, by adding the parameters to the first group and then deleting the second, once all variables have been transferred. That is what COMSOL proposes by such a message, I have tried a few times, and it sometimes works -- Good luck Ivar [/QUOTE] Hi, I am having problem with segregated solvers as well, but what you suggested, doesn't that defeat the purpose of using segregated solvers? if you put all the parameters to a single group than that would make it a (kind of) fully coupled? Thanks
Ivar KJELBERG COMSOL Multiphysics(r) fan, retired, former "Senior Expert" at CSEM SA (CH)
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 4 mai 2013, 03:05 UTC−4
Hi

indeed its worthwile playing a little with the segregated groups, or fully coupled mode, but to sort the items, think over the logic in your moel, what is master what is slave, why ...

--
Good luck
Ivar
Hi indeed its worthwile playing a little with the segregated groups, or fully coupled mode, but to sort the items, think over the logic in your moel, what is master what is slave, why ... -- Good luck Ivar

Note that while COMSOL employees may participate in the discussion forum, COMSOL® software users who are on-subscription should submit their questions via the Support Center for a more comprehensive response from the Technical Support team.

Suggested Content