Menu

Discussion Forum

New Discussion
Filtrer

Discussion Closed This discussion was created more than 6 months ago and has been closed. To start a new discussion with a link back to this one, click here.

Droplet shrinkage / creation for phase field model

Posted 23 sept. 2017, 11:27 UTC−4 Fluid & Heat, Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD), Heat Transfer Version 5.2a 1 Reply

Hamed Keramati
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Hi folks, I'm modeling a two phase (laminar) flow in COMSOL 5.2a. When I am using non-conservative form for the phase field, small droplets disappear, i.e. droplet shrinkage. When I turn the conservative form on some droplets are being created at one of the inlets! Does anybody have any idea about the source of this problem?

Thanks in advance for your help.

Hamed

1 Reply Last Post 24 sept. 2017, 03:57 UTC−4
Ivar KJELBERG COMSOL Multiphysics(r) fan, retired, former "Senior Expert" at CSEM SA (CH)
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 7 years ago 24 sept. 2017, 03:57 UTC−4

Hi

Well the phase filed method is known to have issues with mass conservation for coarse meshes (reminder meshing is your discretisation hence a good measure of the relative precision of your conservation variables, high gradient => you need fine mesh to resolve it), this is due to the integration method that needs many elements to remain well defined and precise.

So my suggestion wouls be to improve (make finer) your mesh in the region of the phase transition zone. There are also the internal mesh refinement methods, check how to turn them on, unfortunately (at least in early 5.2 the mesh refinement did not take into account the velocity vector of the phase transition zone, so it sometimes did not anticipate where the phase frontier is going, hence a bit more mass loss).

-------------------
Have fun COMSOLing,
Sincerely,
Ivar
Hi Well the phase filed method is known to have issues with mass conservation for coarse meshes (reminder meshing is your discretisation hence a good measure of the relative precision of your conservation variables, high gradient => you need fine mesh to resolve it), this is due to the integration method that needs many elements to remain well defined and precise. So my suggestion wouls be to improve (make finer) your mesh in the region of the phase transition zone. There are also the internal mesh refinement methods, check how to turn them on, unfortunately (at least in early 5.2 the mesh refinement did not take into account the velocity vector of the phase transition zone, so it sometimes did not anticipate where the phase frontier is going, hence a bit more mass loss).

Note that while COMSOL employees may participate in the discussion forum, COMSOL® software users who are on-subscription should submit their questions via the Support Center for a more comprehensive response from the Technical Support team.

Suggested Content