Discussion Closed This discussion was created more than 6 months ago and has been closed. To start a new discussion with a link back to this one, click here.
laminr vs turbelent
Posted 15 août 2016, 00:21 UTC−4 Fluid & Heat, Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD), Mesh Version 5.1 3 Replies
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
hello !
my model is PV cell with duct embedded below in order to cool it down . I used laminar conjugate heat transfer ,so the result show good .But depend on Reylond number the flow is turbulent so I try to solve it using k_epsilon turbulent but the result give unexpected high temperature for PV panel reaches to 90 c.As I know the turbelent flow rises the heat exchange coefficient .
my model is PV cell with duct embedded below in order to cool it down . I used laminar conjugate heat transfer ,so the result show good .But depend on Reylond number the flow is turbulent so I try to solve it using k_epsilon turbulent but the result give unexpected high temperature for PV panel reaches to 90 c.As I know the turbelent flow rises the heat exchange coefficient .
3 Replies Last Post 15 août 2016, 21:23 UTC−4
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
8 years ago
Dear Hussein,
In your model, check the wall lift off in length units. If the values are relatively large, you might want to switch to a low-reynolds k-eps model, spallart-Allmaras, or one of our algebraic models (L-VEL / algebraic Yplus), these do not use wall functions which can improve the accuracy in these type of thermal computations.
In your model I suspect that the wall lift off is relatively big, which isolated the panels.
Best regards,
Frank
In your model, check the wall lift off in length units. If the values are relatively large, you might want to switch to a low-reynolds k-eps model, spallart-Allmaras, or one of our algebraic models (L-VEL / algebraic Yplus), these do not use wall functions which can improve the accuracy in these type of thermal computations.
In your model I suspect that the wall lift off is relatively big, which isolated the panels.
Best regards,
Frank
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
8 years ago
Dear Frank ,
Thank you to quick reply !!
I use turbulent _epsilon with low-reynolds number as you advised me,but still have problem in solving ,as you can see from attached picture " time consuming with out finish ".
best regards,
hussein
Thank you to quick reply !!
I use turbulent _epsilon with low-reynolds number as you advised me,but still have problem in solving ,as you can see from attached picture " time consuming with out finish ".
best regards,
hussein
Attachments:
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
8 years ago
hello !!
dear Frank ,
1_spalart _Allmaras and y_ plus also give unexpected temperture !!!
2_L-vel give the same result with laminar flow !!
3_ How can I check the wall lift off in length units
4_did you expect that I have problem in mesh??
thanck you again
best regard,
hussein
dear Frank ,
1_spalart _Allmaras and y_ plus also give unexpected temperture !!!
2_L-vel give the same result with laminar flow !!
3_ How can I check the wall lift off in length units
4_did you expect that I have problem in mesh??
thanck you again
best regard,
hussein