Ivar KJELBERG
COMSOL Multiphysics(r) fan, retired, former "Senior Expert" at CSEM SA (CH)
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
11 nov. 2010, 08:18 UTC−5
Hi
I suppose its related to the height/size ratios 5nm versus 1mm is 1:200'000, I never use ratios (for the mesher) largeer than 10'000 or if possible less.
The true question is what do you want to resolve within your 5nm layer? , cannot you replace its presence by a "thin layer" with a bulk equation form ?
Then have you calculated what it represents to have a 1nm (to have let's say 5 meshes across your 5 nm thick layer) sized mesh elements to fill several mm^3, probably you need a nice cluster just to fill one matrix, not to talk about solving
Finite elements are limited by the "finite" size of RAM on ourPC/WS's ;)
--
Good luck
Ivar
Hi
I suppose its related to the height/size ratios 5nm versus 1mm is 1:200'000, I never use ratios (for the mesher) largeer than 10'000 or if possible less.
The true question is what do you want to resolve within your 5nm layer? , cannot you replace its presence by a "thin layer" with a bulk equation form ?
Then have you calculated what it represents to have a 1nm (to have let's say 5 meshes across your 5 nm thick layer) sized mesh elements to fill several mm^3, probably you need a nice cluster just to fill one matrix, not to talk about solving
Finite elements are limited by the "finite" size of RAM on ourPC/WS's ;)
--
Good luck
Ivar
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
12 nov. 2010, 12:12 UTC−5
That's a good point. Thanks very much.
Michael
That's a good point. Thanks very much.
Michael
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
17 nov. 2010, 15:03 UTC−5
I have been able to create a composite object by making the box that encapsulates everything smaller. However, I have now had a lot of trouble meshing and getting a solution. I cannot mesh the entire object using Free Mesh even with an extremely coarse setting without running out of memory. If I try to Sweep Mesh the small sections of the model and Free Mesh the rest I often get a 'Singular Matrix' error (which I do not understand). I have been able to mesh the entire object under a few circumstances, but when I then try to solve it I get a 'Empty cavity generated' error.
I assume that this is because the resolution of the mesh is not small enough in the very thin regions. I can perhaps try approximating the thin layer with a 2D sheet but obviously it would be ideal if I could simulate exactly what is happening in the electrodes.
Thanks for any suggestions you might have.
Michael
I have been able to create a composite object by making the box that encapsulates everything smaller. However, I have now had a lot of trouble meshing and getting a solution. I cannot mesh the entire object using Free Mesh even with an extremely coarse setting without running out of memory. If I try to Sweep Mesh the small sections of the model and Free Mesh the rest I often get a 'Singular Matrix' error (which I do not understand). I have been able to mesh the entire object under a few circumstances, but when I then try to solve it I get a 'Empty cavity generated' error.
I assume that this is because the resolution of the mesh is not small enough in the very thin regions. I can perhaps try approximating the thin layer with a 2D sheet but obviously it would be ideal if I could simulate exactly what is happening in the electrodes.
Thanks for any suggestions you might have.
Michael
Ivar KJELBERG
COMSOL Multiphysics(r) fan, retired, former "Senior Expert" at CSEM SA (CH)
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
18 nov. 2010, 05:29 UTC−5
Hi
yes meshing is an art ;) but are you really sure that the you will have a temperature gradient in the 5nm thickness direction, hence obliging you to use a 3D meshing and not surface physics ?
--
Good luck
Ivar
Hi
yes meshing is an art ;) but are you really sure that the you will have a temperature gradient in the 5nm thickness direction, hence obliging you to use a 3D meshing and not surface physics ?
--
Good luck
Ivar
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
18 nov. 2010, 11:26 UTC−5
That's a good point. I will try to simulate it as a surface rather than a 3D object.
Thanks again.
Michael
That's a good point. I will try to simulate it as a surface rather than a 3D object.
Thanks again.
Michael