Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
9 years ago
12 janv. 2016, 04:30 UTC−5
I have done what you asked by using two physics nodes, one for each domain. Let's say that in domain 1 you have concentration C1 and in domain concentration C2 (they are the same molecules but in different domains). At the internal boundary, in domain 1 define
C1 = P*C2
and in domain 2
C2 = C1/P
and P is the partition coefficient between the domains.
For closer details, you can have a look at
dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mbs.2014.03.014
BR
Lasse
I have done what you asked by using two physics nodes, one for each domain. Let's say that in domain 1 you have concentration C1 and in domain concentration C2 (they are the same molecules but in different domains). At the internal boundary, in domain 1 define
C1 = P*C2
and in domain 2
C2 = C1/P
and P is the partition coefficient between the domains.
For closer details, you can have a look at
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mbs.2014.03.014
BR
Lasse
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
9 years ago
12 janv. 2016, 08:17 UTC−5
Hi Lasse,
thanks for the reply. How about define flux discontinuity when have two physics nodes? Shall I use the same way you mentioned below for defining flux discontinuity or I can use identity pairs for it?
regards,
Hansong
Hi Lasse,
thanks for the reply. How about define flux discontinuity when have two physics nodes? Shall I use the same way you mentioned below for defining flux discontinuity or I can use identity pairs for it?
regards,
Hansong
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
9 years ago
12 janv. 2016, 08:23 UTC−5
I do not understand these identity pairs, never used them.
Flux discontinuity is formed if you define different fluxes in domain 1 and 2 at the boundary. But as you certainly understand, flux discontinuity means accumulation or depletion of material at the interface.
BR
Lasse
I do not understand these identity pairs, never used them.
Flux discontinuity is formed if you define different fluxes in domain 1 and 2 at the boundary. But as you certainly understand, flux discontinuity means accumulation or depletion of material at the interface.
BR
Lasse
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
9 years ago
13 janv. 2016, 03:57 UTC−5
As what you said above, I use two physics nodes, one for each domain. And I set the concentration and flux are continuous across the internal boundary, but now it is not converged. Do you know any idea why? The difference is just that when I use 1 physics node defined on two domain, by default the concentration and the flux are continuous and it is converged.
thanks,
Hansong
As what you said above, I use two physics nodes, one for each domain. And I set the concentration and flux are continuous across the internal boundary, but now it is not converged. Do you know any idea why? The difference is just that when I use 1 physics node defined on two domain, by default the concentration and the flux are continuous and it is converged.
thanks,
Hansong
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
9 years ago
13 janv. 2016, 04:07 UTC−5
I need to see the model file, can you submit to me privately?
Lasse
I need to see the model file, can you submit to me privately?
Lasse
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
9 years ago
14 janv. 2016, 20:48 UTC−5
Hi Lasse,
I have figured out my problem already. It is just the sign of flux at the internal boundary which cause not convergence.
thanks,
Hansong
Hi Lasse,
I have figured out my problem already. It is just the sign of flux at the internal boundary which cause not convergence.
thanks,
Hansong