Henrik Sönnerlind
COMSOL Employee
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
28 oct. 2013, 05:22 UTC−4
Hi Steve,
In version 4.4 (soon to be released) this limitation is removed. The viscoelastic material has been moved to be a subnode under Linear Elastic, and has also improved with a number of new options.
In the current version it is rather difficult to do what you want, but one way could be to use two separate Solid Mechanics interfaces (but with the same degrees of freedom). In one of them a viscoelastic material is used, and in the other one a viscoplastic material is used. The interfaces could then communicate the viscoelastic stress and viscoplastic strain through the Initial stress/strain features.
Regards,
Henrik
Hi Steve,
In version 4.4 (soon to be released) this limitation is removed. The viscoelastic material has been moved to be a subnode under Linear Elastic, and has also improved with a number of new options.
In the current version it is rather difficult to do what you want, but one way could be to use two separate Solid Mechanics interfaces (but with the same degrees of freedom). In one of them a viscoelastic material is used, and in the other one a viscoplastic material is used. The interfaces could then communicate the viscoelastic stress and viscoplastic strain through the Initial stress/strain features.
Regards,
Henrik
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
28 oct. 2013, 11:37 UTC−4
Dear Henrik,
Thank you so much for your helpful replies. It would be a really good news if the viscoelasticity and viscoplasticity can be modeled simultaneously in the following version of Comsol. I will also try your suggestions on using two separate Solid Mechanics interfaces for now.
I had another questions and would like your and anyone's opinions:
The Anand model is the only option for viscoplasticity in the current version of Comsol. If I want to build a new viscoplastic (not plastic) model using a different yield surface, plastic potential, and flow rule, how can I define them in Comsol? My thinking to this problem is to define them as a "Potential" model under "Creep" node. Do you have any suggestions on this?
Thank you again,
Steve
Hi Steve,
In version 4.4 (soon to be released) this limitation is removed. The viscoelastic material has been moved to be a subnode under Linear Elastic, and has also improved with a number of new options.
In the current version it is rather difficult to do what you want, but one way could be to use two separate Solid Mechanics interfaces (but with the same degrees of freedom). In one of them a viscoelastic material is used, and in the other one a viscoplastic material is used. The interfaces could then communicate the viscoelastic stress and viscoplastic strain through the Initial stress/strain features.
Regards,
Henrik
Dear Henrik,
Thank you so much for your helpful replies. It would be a really good news if the viscoelasticity and viscoplasticity can be modeled simultaneously in the following version of Comsol. I will also try your suggestions on using two separate Solid Mechanics interfaces for now.
I had another questions and would like your and anyone's opinions:
The Anand model is the only option for viscoplasticity in the current version of Comsol. If I want to build a new viscoplastic (not plastic) model using a different yield surface, plastic potential, and flow rule, how can I define them in Comsol? My thinking to this problem is to define them as a "Potential" model under "Creep" node. Do you have any suggestions on this?
Thank you again,
Steve
[QUOTE]
Hi Steve,
In version 4.4 (soon to be released) this limitation is removed. The viscoelastic material has been moved to be a subnode under Linear Elastic, and has also improved with a number of new options.
In the current version it is rather difficult to do what you want, but one way could be to use two separate Solid Mechanics interfaces (but with the same degrees of freedom). In one of them a viscoelastic material is used, and in the other one a viscoplastic material is used. The interfaces could then communicate the viscoelastic stress and viscoplastic strain through the Initial stress/strain features.
Regards,
Henrik
[/QUOTE]
Henrik Sönnerlind
COMSOL Employee
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
29 oct. 2013, 03:34 UTC−4
I had another questions and would like your and anyone's opinions:
The Anand model is the only option for viscoplasticity in the current version of Comsol. If I want to build a new viscoplastic (not plastic) model using a different yield surface, plastic potential, and flow rule, how can I define them in Comsol? My thinking to this problem is to define them as a "Potential" model under "Creep" node. Do you have any suggestions on this?
Hi Steve,
The term 'viscoplasticity' is not unique, so there could be different approaches depending on the actual physics described by your constitutive equations. Your approach is one which seems good. For other cases, using Plasticity, but with strain rate dependent material data could also be a possibility.
By the way: If you will try the 'two interface approach', note that only one of them should actually produce a stiffness contribution. So you need to go into Equation view and remove the weak expression (stress:test(strain)) for the viscoelastic material. If not, there will be double stiffness contributions.
Regards,
Henrik
[QUOTE]
I had another questions and would like your and anyone's opinions:
The Anand model is the only option for viscoplasticity in the current version of Comsol. If I want to build a new viscoplastic (not plastic) model using a different yield surface, plastic potential, and flow rule, how can I define them in Comsol? My thinking to this problem is to define them as a "Potential" model under "Creep" node. Do you have any suggestions on this?
[/QUOTE]
Hi Steve,
The term 'viscoplasticity' is not unique, so there could be different approaches depending on the actual physics described by your constitutive equations. Your approach is one which seems good. For other cases, using Plasticity, but with strain rate dependent material data could also be a possibility.
By the way: If you will try the 'two interface approach', note that only one of them should actually produce a stiffness contribution. So you need to go into Equation view and remove the weak expression (stress:test(strain)) for the viscoelastic material. If not, there will be double stiffness contributions.
Regards,
Henrik