Edgar J. Kaiser
Certified Consultant
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
5 years ago
4 mai 2020, 15:37 UTC−4
Updated:
5 years ago
4 mai 2020, 15:38 UTC−4
Jun,
permittivity is a material property that needs to be specified. The model cannot measure it. So unless you specify a frequency-dependent permittivity you won't see any impact of the frequency you apply to the capacitance of the model.
Cheers
Edgar
-------------------
Edgar J. Kaiser
emPhys Physical Technology
www.emphys.com
Jun,
permittivity is a material property that needs to be specified. The model cannot measure it. So unless you **specify** a frequency-dependent permittivity you won't see any impact of the frequency you apply to the capacitance of the model.
Cheers
Edgar
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
5 years ago
4 mai 2020, 15:46 UTC−4
Hello Edgar, thanks for the response. Yes that was also a problem of mine and what I intend to solve later, but I am not so sure if it is correct to calculate my model using the time dependent study - since I cannot seem to calculate my capacitance, and comsol doesnt have the equations either? I know how to do it using the frequency domain, but is there a way to do it using the time dependent study (because of my mixed frequencies voltages)? I tried calculating using Z = U(t)/i(t) and C = jw/Z, but my values dont seem right.
Am I missing something here? Do you mean that if i specify a frequency dependent permittivity in a time dependent study I would be able to calculate the capacitance (how?) ?
Jun
Hello Edgar, thanks for the response. Yes that was also a problem of mine and what I intend to solve later, but I am not so sure if it is correct to calculate my model using the time dependent study - since I cannot seem to calculate my capacitance, and comsol doesnt have the equations either? I know how to do it using the frequency domain, but is there a way to do it using the time dependent study (because of my mixed frequencies voltages)? I tried calculating using Z = U(t)/i(t) and C = jw/Z, but my values dont seem right.
Am I missing something here? Do you mean that if i specify a frequency dependent permittivity in a time dependent study I would be able to calculate the capacitance (how?) ?
Jun
Edgar J. Kaiser
Certified Consultant
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
5 years ago
4 mai 2020, 16:31 UTC−4
Jun,
impedance is a frequency domain concept and not suitable in the time domain. Capacitance is pretty much a geometrical thing. So you can measure it in a frequency domain model at one frequency and if you have the frequency dependent permittivity it is a hand calculation on paper to get it at the harmonic frequency.
Cheers
Edgar
-------------------
Edgar J. Kaiser
emPhys Physical Technology
www.emphys.com
Jun,
impedance is a frequency domain concept and not suitable in the time domain. Capacitance is pretty much a geometrical thing. So you can measure it in a frequency domain model at one frequency and if you have the frequency dependent permittivity it is a hand calculation on paper to get it at the harmonic frequency.
Cheers
Edgar
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
5 years ago
7 mai 2020, 12:36 UTC−4
Hello Edgar,
thank you, I have managed to calculate the capacitance using the Frequency Domain study. Although I must say I have doubts about your statement:
'So you can measure it in a frequency domain model at one frequency and if you have the frequency dependent permittivity it is a hand calculation on paper to get it at the harmonic frequency'
In this case are you assuming that the material has a linear behaviour?
Let's say by measuring epsr at single frequencies, at 50 Hz my material has an epsr1 = 3 and at 550Hz epsr1 = 6. However, when harmonics are present, eg 50Hz + 550 Hz, how does one 'calculate'/determine the end permittivity of the material at such mixed frequencies 50Hz+550Hz ?
A second question relating to this, considering I have a material that has a relative permittivity which is frequency dependent, is it possible to somehow define this epsr(f) in my material properties? I have tried defining the real part of the permittivity epsr1 and imaginary part epsr2 as a function of frequency as two analytic functions at global definitions but cannot implement them in the material properties table.
Is there a way to do this, regardless of the implemented study (time dependent or frequency domain)?
This is an interesting topic for me and I would love to hear other opinions!
Jun
Hello Edgar,
thank you, I have managed to calculate the capacitance using the Frequency Domain study. Although I must say I have doubts about your statement:
> 'So you can measure it in a frequency domain model at one frequency and if you have the frequency dependent permittivity it is a hand calculation on paper to get it at the harmonic frequency'
In this case are you assuming that the material has a linear behaviour?
Let's say by measuring epsr at single frequencies, at 50 Hz my material has an epsr1 = 3 and at 550Hz epsr1 = 6. However, when harmonics are present, eg 50Hz + 550 Hz, how does one 'calculate'/determine the end permittivity of the material at such mixed frequencies 50Hz+550Hz ?
A second question relating to this, considering I have a material that has a relative permittivity which is frequency dependent, is it possible to somehow define this epsr(f) in my material properties? I have tried defining the real part of the permittivity epsr1 and imaginary part epsr2 as a function of frequency as two analytic functions at global definitions but cannot implement them in the material properties table.
Is there a way to do this, regardless of the implemented study (time dependent or frequency domain)?
This is an interesting topic for me and I would love to hear other opinions!
Jun
Edgar J. Kaiser
Certified Consultant
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
5 years ago
7 mai 2020, 16:02 UTC−4
Jun,
in the frequency domain everything is linear. Again a 'mixed' permittivity is not a suitable concept in the frequency domain.
A frequency dependent permittivity can be defined as eps(freq) and it can be complex, such as eps(freq) = f1(freq) + j*f2(freq). Define it under the respective material node.
One thing you may consider to get a known frequency dependent permittivity and mixed frequencies into the time domain is to run an inverse FFT on an appropriately set up frequency sweep with a suitable window function. I have successfully done that in acoustics and it should just work the same way in electromagnetics. However, I can tell you it is not exactly simple.
Good luck,
Edgar
-------------------
Edgar J. Kaiser
emPhys Physical Technology
www.emphys.com
Jun,
in the frequency domain everything is linear. Again a 'mixed' permittivity is not a suitable concept in the frequency domain.
A frequency dependent permittivity can be defined as eps(freq) and it can be complex, such as eps(freq) = f1(freq) + j*f2(freq). Define it under the respective material node.
One thing you may consider to get a known frequency dependent permittivity and mixed frequencies into the time domain is to run an inverse FFT on an appropriately set up frequency sweep with a suitable window function. I have successfully done that in acoustics and it should just work the same way in electromagnetics. However, I can tell you it is not exactly simple.
Good luck,
Edgar