Lars Dammann
COMSOL Employee
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
5 years ago
30 janv. 2020, 10:22 UTC−5
Hi,
mf.Bx, mf.By and mf.Bz are the x-, y,- and z-component of the magnetic flux density vector. mf.normB is the norm of that vector, which (simply speaking) is sqrt(mf.Bx^2+mf.By^2+mf.Bz^2).
If you are working in the frequency domain, it is actually the complex norm of the vector, which is more like:
sqrt(mf.Bx*conj(mf.Bx)+mf.By*conj(mf.By)+mf.Bz*conj(mf.Bz))
but you probably don't need to worry about that difference.
Hope that helps,
Lars
Hi,
mf.Bx, mf.By and mf.Bz are the x-, y,- and z-component of the magnetic flux density vector. mf.normB is the norm of that vector, which (simply speaking) is sqrt(mf.Bx^2+mf.By^2+mf.Bz^2).
If you are working in the frequency domain, it is actually the complex norm of the vector, which is more like:
sqrt(mf.Bx*conj(mf.Bx)+mf.By*conj(mf.By)+mf.Bz*conj(mf.Bz))
but you probably don't need to worry about that difference.
Hope that helps,
Lars
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
5 years ago
11 févr. 2020, 16:52 UTC−5
Hi,
mf.Bx, mf.By and mf.Bz are the x-, y,- and z-component of the magnetic flux density vector. mf.normB is the norm of that vector, which (simply speaking) is sqrt(mf.Bx^2+mf.By^2+mf.Bz^2).
If you are working in the frequency domain, it is actually the complex norm of the vector, which is more like:
sqrt(mf.Bxconj(mf.Bx)+mf.Byconj(mf.By)+mf.Bz*conj(mf.Bz))
but you probably don't need to worry about that difference.
Hope that helps,
Lars
Now I understood.
Thanks
>Hi,
>
>mf.Bx, mf.By and mf.Bz are the x-, y,- and z-component of the magnetic flux density vector. mf.normB is the norm of that vector, which (simply speaking) is sqrt(mf.Bx^2+mf.By^2+mf.Bz^2).
>
>If you are working in the frequency domain, it is actually the complex norm of the vector, which is more like:
>
> sqrt(mf.Bx*conj(mf.Bx)+mf.By*conj(mf.By)+mf.Bz*conj(mf.Bz))
>
>but you probably don't need to worry about that difference.
>
>Hope that helps,
>Lars
Now I understood.
Thanks