Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
20 mai 2010, 14:00 UTC−4
Hi Alex,
Look at the flow over a cylinder example in the modeling library.
Hi Alex,
Look at the flow over a cylinder example in the modeling library.
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
21 mai 2010, 06:52 UTC−4
Hi Alex,
Look at the flow over a cylinder example in the modeling library.
Thanks Danial. It has been very useful.
I use the turbulent k-epsilon model, so the operator react() always returned the zero value.
With the operator T_x_chns / T_y_chns seems that it works well.
In other way, I would be able to calculate theese coefficients, with the momentum balance into rectangular domain with the airfoil inside. It would not contemplate the turbulence influences in the boundary layer and it would be more accurate.
THANKS.
[QUOTE]
Hi Alex,
Look at the flow over a cylinder example in the modeling library.
[/QUOTE]
Thanks Danial. It has been very useful.
I use the turbulent k-epsilon model, so the operator react() always returned the zero value.
With the operator T_x_chns / T_y_chns seems that it works well.
In other way, I would be able to calculate theese coefficients, with the momentum balance into rectangular domain with the airfoil inside. It would not contemplate the turbulence influences in the boundary layer and it would be more accurate.
THANKS.
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
21 mai 2010, 08:41 UTC−4
Great to hear it.
Also, if you enable the weak constaints in the N-S do you get lm5 lm6? they are the lagrange multipliers that are the best to calculate the forces (they are the same as reacf(u) and reacf(v))
sorry I can not help more, as I have not played with turbulence yet.
Great to hear it.
Also, if you enable the weak constaints in the N-S do you get lm5 lm6? they are the lagrange multipliers that are the best to calculate the forces (they are the same as reacf(u) and reacf(v))
sorry I can not help more, as I have not played with turbulence yet.
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
24 mai 2010, 13:51 UTC−4
I am about to modelling a fin with 3D fluid flow k-epsilon environment. I am excited.
Thanks again Danial.
I am about to modelling a fin with 3D fluid flow k-epsilon environment. I am excited.
Thanks again Danial.
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
1 juil. 2011, 09:24 UTC−4
hi, have you worked out the lift and drag coeff on the airfoil?? Does that depends on the time or may be I can use the stationary model?
I am running a project related to that... Do you have any idea of how to work out the coeff with attack angle? Thanks.
hi, have you worked out the lift and drag coeff on the airfoil?? Does that depends on the time or may be I can use the stationary model?
I am running a project related to that... Do you have any idea of how to work out the coeff with attack angle? Thanks.
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
29 nov. 2011, 18:26 UTC−5
Hi Alex
I am facing the same problem with reacf() since it gives me zero at all times. i am solving a flow between two eccentric cylinders and i would like to find a load that the inner cylinder can handle by integrating over the pressure on the inner cylinder surface.
Hi Alex
I am facing the same problem with reacf() since it gives me zero at all times. i am solving a flow between two eccentric cylinders and i would like to find a load that the inner cylinder can handle by integrating over the pressure on the inner cylinder surface.