Menu

Discussion Forum

New Discussion
Filtrer

Note: This discussion is about an older version of the COMSOL Multiphysics® software. The information provided may be out of date.

Discussion Closed This discussion was created more than 6 months ago and has been closed. To start a new discussion with a link back to this one, click here.

Using symmetry with PML in RF Module

Posted 7 févr. 2014, 10:47 UTC−5 RF & Microwave Engineering, Modeling Tools & Definitions, Parameters, Variables, & Functions Version 4.3 3 Replies

Bartek Chaber
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Hello,

My question is about possibility to utilize a symmetry in cases like in dipole antenna. The example model of halfwave dipole antenna from COMSOL models it without taking any symmetry into account, and I wonder why is it so?

I have tried to model only a half of the dipole from the example applying Perfect Magnetic Conductor boundary condition on the plane of the symmetry. But the radiation pattern is not correct so I must be missing something. Does PML should be modified or set up to allow the symmetry?

Regards,
Bartek Chaber
3 Replies Last Post 11 févr. 2014, 10:12 UTC−5
Sergei Yushanov Certified Consultant
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 10 févr. 2014, 08:04 UTC−5
Bartek,

PMC is an appropriate boundary condition to account for symmetry plane. To get correct radiation pattern with symmetry plane, you need to impose the same symmetry boundary condition for the Far-Field Calculation: under Far-Field Domain>Far-Field Calculation node, check Symmetry in E (PMC) box and choose appropriate plane.

Attached is model for the dipole antenna with symmetry plane and comparison with analytical solution.

Best regards,
Sergei
Bartek, PMC is an appropriate boundary condition to account for symmetry plane. To get correct radiation pattern with symmetry plane, you need to impose the same symmetry boundary condition for the Far-Field Calculation: under Far-Field Domain>Far-Field Calculation node, check Symmetry in E (PMC) box and choose appropriate plane. Attached is model for the dipole antenna with symmetry plane and comparison with analytical solution. Best regards, Sergei
Bartek Chaber
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 10 févr. 2014, 17:54 UTC−5
Thank you very much Sergei!

I've downloaded your model, but I'm unable to open it because my version of COMSOL is too old, apparently. But I see your point and I've tried this approach.

Right now I'm plotting the E/H ratio on the surface with PMC applied and I see a different results than in the original, full model. Maybe there is no point in plotting it using this surface?

Best,
Bartek
Thank you very much Sergei! I've downloaded your model, but I'm unable to open it because my version of COMSOL is too old, apparently. But I see your point and I've tried this approach. Right now I'm plotting the E/H ratio on the surface with PMC applied and I see a different results than in the original, full model. Maybe there is no point in plotting it using this surface? Best, Bartek
Bartek Chaber
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 11 févr. 2014, 10:12 UTC−5
I've tried to recreate a dipole model with symmetry. To confirm that it is correct I've used E/H relation.
You can see the results attached. It can be seen that while the full model conforms the theory that a dipole should have stronger electric field in the near field which will reach a minimum and then increase towards the impedance of free space. I'm not sure how to interpret the results from the model with a symmetry.

If you want I can provide you with Java files with the simulations.

Best,
Bartek Chaber
I've tried to recreate a dipole model with symmetry. To confirm that it is correct I've used E/H relation. You can see the results attached. It can be seen that while the full model conforms the theory that a dipole should have stronger electric field in the near field which will reach a minimum and then increase towards the impedance of free space. I'm not sure how to interpret the results from the model with a symmetry. If you want I can provide you with Java files with the simulations. Best, Bartek Chaber

Note that while COMSOL employees may participate in the discussion forum, COMSOL® software users who are on-subscription should submit their questions via the Support Center for a more comprehensive response from the Technical Support team.

Suggested Content