RF Module Antenna Calculation

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Hello, I would like to ask for some advice. I am currently using the Electromagnetic Waves, Frequency Domain (RF Module) to build an antenna, with the frequency range set to 0.7 GHz - 5.1 GHz and a step size of 0.6. The calculation process is very slow, but it eventually results in an error. I hope that the S11 parameters and voltage standing wave ratio (VSWR) of this model can be calculated up to 5.0 GHz and above, and I also need to observe whether the S11 parameter values are less than -10. I previously consulted with you and received your response, and indeed, I made a mistake. After recalculating according to the solutions you provided, the error still persists. The error message is: "Feature: Stationary Solver 1, failed to find a solution. The linear iteration diverged. The returned solution does not converge. Not all parameter steps were returned." Could you please tell me what might be causing this? Is it an issue with the model? How can this problem be resolved? Thank you very much for your assistance!



3 Replies Last Post 4 mars 2025, 11:58 UTC−5
Robert Koslover Certified Consultant

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 2 months ago 3 mars 2025, 22:40 UTC−5

Do you have a version of your .mph file in English?

-------------------
Scientific Applications & Research Associates (SARA) Inc.
www.comsol.com/partners-consultants/certified-consultants/sara
Do you have a version of your .mph file in English?

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 month ago 4 mars 2025, 09:34 UTC−5

Hello, I have re-uploaded the English version of the .mph file. My issue is as follows: I am currently using the Electromagnetic Waves, Frequency Domain (RF Module) to construct an antenna, with the frequency range set from 0.7 GHz to 5.1 GHz, in steps of 0.6. The computation process is very slow, and eventually, an error occurs. I hope that the S11 parameter and the Voltage Standing Wave Ratio (VSWR) of this model can be calculated up to 5.0 GHz and above, ensuring that the S11 parameter value is less than -10. I previously consulted with you and received your reply, and indeed, I was mistaken. After recalculating according to the solution you provided, the error still persists. The error message is: "Feature: Stationary Solver 1, Failed to find a solution. Linear iteration diverged. The returned solution has not converged. Not all parameter steps have been returned." Could you please tell me what might be causing this? Is it a problem with the model? How can this issue be resolved? Thank you very much for your assistance!

Hello, I have re-uploaded the English version of the .mph file. My issue is as follows: I am currently using the Electromagnetic Waves, Frequency Domain (RF Module) to construct an antenna, with the frequency range set from 0.7 GHz to 5.1 GHz, in steps of 0.6. The computation process is very slow, and eventually, an error occurs. I hope that the S11 parameter and the Voltage Standing Wave Ratio (VSWR) of this model can be calculated up to 5.0 GHz and above, ensuring that the S11 parameter value is less than -10. I previously consulted with you and received your reply, and indeed, I was mistaken. After recalculating according to the solution you provided, the error still persists. The error message is: "Feature: Stationary Solver 1, Failed to find a solution. Linear iteration diverged. The returned solution has not converged. Not all parameter steps have been returned." Could you please tell me what might be causing this? Is it a problem with the model? How can this issue be resolved? Thank you very much for your assistance!


Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 month ago 4 mars 2025, 11:58 UTC−5
Updated: 1 month ago 4 mars 2025, 13:25 UTC−5

I approximately halved the mesh size and switched the Analysis Methodology from Fast to Intermediate. It solved in 2 min at the highest frequency.

(added note: actually it was the mesh size that made the difference, not the Methodology. I have seen this behavior before where a mesh size too large refuses to converge. I assume this is because some details of the field cannot be represented with the larger mesh size. Also: it looks like this problem can be reduced by one quarter using symmetry).

I approximately halved the mesh size and switched the Analysis Methodology from Fast to Intermediate. It solved in 2 min at the highest frequency. (added note: actually it was the mesh size that made the difference, not the Methodology. I have seen this behavior before where a mesh size too large refuses to converge. I assume this is because some details of the field cannot be represented with the larger mesh size. Also: it looks like this problem can be reduced by one quarter using symmetry).

Reply

Please read the discussion forum rules before posting.

Please log in to post a reply.

Note that while COMSOL employees may participate in the discussion forum, COMSOL® software users who are on-subscription should submit their questions via the Support Center for a more comprehensive response from the Technical Support team.