Seeking Help with Capacitive Sensor Modeling in COMSOL

Sávio Correia Bezerra

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Hello everyone! I’m working on modeling a capacitive sensor using COMSOL. The sensor I’m studying consists of an FR4 substrate with 15 pairs of copper interdigital electrodes. The measurements I took with the sensor showed capacitance values ranging from 6 pF to 100 pF (using air, water, and ethanol as test media). My goal is to model this sensor using the Finite Element Method (FEM).

Initially, I developed a reduced model, the RVE (which represents only one pair of electrodes). By proportionally multiplying the results, I obtained values relatively close to the measured ones, with errors ranging from 1% to 17%.

Currently, I’m working on a full model that aims to represent all the geometric characteristics of the real sensor. Although I haven’t been able to fully replicate all the feed lines, the model seems fairly accurate. However, the errors are even larger than in the reduced model.

Does anyone have suggestions on how I can improve the model? Is there any way to import the .gerber file used in the sensor’s fabrication directly into COMSOL? Or could this be a mesh adjustment issue?

I’m feeling a bit lost, so any help would be greatly appreciated. I’ll attach some images that illustrate the problem. If anyone is interested, I can also share my current model file.



1 Reply Last Post 28 oct. 2024, 10:28 UTC−4
Jeff Hiller COMSOL Employee

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 4 days ago 28 oct. 2024, 10:28 UTC−4

Hello Savio,

If you have access to the Uncertainty Quantification Module (you can check on that under File>Licensed and Used Products), you may want to start by checking how sensitive your results are to the inputs. My thought here is that if the actual experimental values of the inputs (material properties, dimensions, applied voltage, etc) are each off by a little bit compared to what you typed into your model, the results produced by the model could well be off by the sort of percentages you are seeing.

Best,

Jeff

-------------------
Jeff Hiller
Hello Savio, If you have access to the [Uncertainty Quantification Module](https://www.comsol.com/uncertainty-quantification-module) (you can check on that under File>Licensed and Used Products), you may want to start by checking how sensitive your results are to the inputs. My thought here is that if the actual experimental values of the inputs (material properties, dimensions, applied voltage, etc) are each off by a little bit compared to what you typed into your model, the results produced by the model could well be off by the sort of percentages you are seeing. Best, Jeff

Reply

Please read the discussion forum rules before posting.

Please log in to post a reply.

Note that while COMSOL employees may participate in the discussion forum, COMSOL® software users who are on-subscription should submit their questions via the Support Center for a more comprehensive response from the Technical Support team.