Menu

Discussion Forum

New Discussion
Filtrer

Discussion Closed This discussion was created more than 6 months ago and has been closed. To start a new discussion with a link back to this one, click here.

Structural Mechanics Error When Making Model Smaller

Posted 25 oct. 2023, 21:18 UTC−4 Geometry, Structural Mechanics, Physics Interfaces Version 6.1 2 Replies

Zafiro Paredes
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Hello,

I am recently starting a project and I wanted to apply the solid mechanic functions with the shell function. I used the block_on_arch file in the COMSOL libraries to understand the functionalities since I am relatively new to structural mechanics.

However, when I attempted to downsize the file from a mm unit to a nm unit, the solver had large errors. I ran the file in mm originally with my desired dimensions and it runs just fine. However, when I change it to nm, it does not produce a result. Is there a measurement in the shell physics, where the error originates from, that I am unaware of? Or is it difficult to apply the same calculations to an extremely small model?

I attached the modified block_on_arch file

Thank you, Zafiro

Attachments:

2 Replies Last Post 20 déc. 2023, 17:22 UTC−5
Henrik Sönnerlind COMSOL Employee

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 year ago 26 oct. 2023, 05:26 UTC−4

There are a number of issues in your example. This list may not be exhaustive:

  • Essential nodes in Solid Mechanics are disabled, making the model singular
  • The load is 1 exaPa
  • The geometry is not the same as in the original, as different scale factors are applied for different geometrical sizes
  • The variable scalings under Dependent variables assume original units
  • Penalty factor in the Contact node may have to be adjusted

Note that this is a highly nonlinear problem, so you may change its properties fundamentally by changing, for example, aspect ratios.

-------------------
Henrik Sönnerlind
COMSOL
There are a number of issues in your example. This list may not be exhaustive: * Essential nodes in Solid Mechanics are disabled, making the model singular * The load is 1 exaPa * The geometry is not the same as in the original, as different scale factors are applied for different geometrical sizes * The variable scalings under Dependent variables assume original units * Penalty factor in the Contact node may have to be adjusted Note that this is a highly nonlinear problem, so you may change its properties fundamentally by changing, for example, aspect ratios.
Zafiro Paredes
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 year ago 20 déc. 2023, 17:22 UTC−5
Updated: 1 year ago 20 déc. 2023, 17:06 UTC−5

Hello, I apologize for the late response, I took into account what you said and made some changes and I got some simulations working.

Thank you for your feedback!

Hello, I apologize for the late response, I took into account what you said and made some changes and I got some simulations working. Thank you for your feedback!

Note that while COMSOL employees may participate in the discussion forum, COMSOL® software users who are on-subscription should submit their questions via the Support Center for a more comprehensive response from the Technical Support team.

Suggested Content