Jeff Hiller
COMSOL Employee
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
4 years ago
5 janv. 2021, 10:43 UTC−5
Hello Sharique,
See https://www.comsol.com/blogs/computing-controlling-volume-cavity/ .
Best regards,
Jeff
-------------------
Jeff Hiller
Hello Sharique,
See https://www.comsol.com/blogs/computing-controlling-volume-cavity/ .
Best regards,
Jeff
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
4 years ago
5 janv. 2021, 14:23 UTC−5
Updated:
4 years ago
5 janv. 2021, 14:24 UTC−5
Thank you, Jeff.
See https://www.comsol.com/blogs/computing-controlling-volume-cavity/ .
In this model, the area of the cavity has been found. In a 2D-axisymmetric arrangement (such as the one in original query), selecting the interior boundary and choosing the 'compute with revolving geometry on' option, should give me the volume of the cavity for the expression AreaInt(-z*solid.nz), isn't it?
Thank you, Jeff.
>See https://www.comsol.com/blogs/computing-controlling-volume-cavity/ .
In this model, the area of the cavity has been found. In a 2D-axisymmetric arrangement (such as the one in original query), selecting the interior boundary and choosing the 'compute with revolving geometry on' option, should give me the volume of the cavity for the expression AreaInt(-z*solid.nz), isn't it?
Jeff Hiller
COMSOL Employee
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
4 years ago
5 janv. 2021, 14:41 UTC−5
That's the idea, yes. You can check your implementation by using a toy geometry for which the analytical expression of the volume is known, like a sphere, cylinder, or cone.
Best,
Jeff
-------------------
Jeff Hiller
That's the idea, yes. You can check your implementation by using a toy geometry for which the analytical expression of the volume is known, like a sphere, cylinder, or cone.
Best,
Jeff