Robert Koslover
Certified Consultant
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
4 years ago
15 déc. 2020, 17:06 UTC−5
Updated:
4 years ago
15 déc. 2020, 17:14 UTC−5
Perhaps you could post your model to the forum?
In a 3D model, have you considered employing a cylinder that is modeled as centered within a cylindrical computational volume, where your scattering cylinder is continuous from one computational end-cap boundary to the other, and then making use of Floquet boundary conditions on the end-cap faces (i.e., those perpendicular to the cylinder axis), so as to effectively extend the cylinder to infinity? (I also wonder if you might even be able to get away with simple scattering boundary conditions, in this case.)
-------------------
Scientific Applications & Research Associates (SARA) Inc.
www.comsol.com/partners-consultants/certified-consultants/sara
Perhaps you could post your model to the forum?
In a 3D model, have you considered employing a cylinder that is modeled as centered within a cylindrical computational volume, where your scattering cylinder is continuous from one computational end-cap boundary to the other, and then making use of Floquet boundary conditions on the end-cap faces (i.e., those perpendicular to the cylinder axis), so as to effectively extend the cylinder to infinity? (I also wonder if you might even be able to get away with simple scattering boundary conditions, in this case.)
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
4 years ago
17 déc. 2020, 11:19 UTC−5
Updated:
4 years ago
19 déc. 2020, 03:57 UTC−5
Thanks for your reply. It is 3D model. I have attached it for you.
Thanks for your reply. It is 3D model. I have attached it for you.
Robert Koslover
Certified Consultant
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
4 years ago
17 déc. 2020, 11:48 UTC−5
I haven't taken the time to understand your whole model, but I can see that your electric field and k vector are both in a plane perpendicular to the axis of the cylinder. This makes your problem easier! Combined with the fact that you are interested in an infinitely long cylinder, this means you should probably do this whole problem in 2D, representing the cylinder by a circle (the effectively-infinite cylinder would be perpendicular to your 2D plane). So I encourage you to attack the problem in 2D. If that works well, you can consider more general wave incidence conditions in a 3D model.
-------------------
Scientific Applications & Research Associates (SARA) Inc.
www.comsol.com/partners-consultants/certified-consultants/sara
I haven't taken the time to understand your whole model, but I can see that your electric field and k vector are both in a plane *perpendicular* to the axis of the cylinder. This makes your problem easier! Combined with the fact that you are interested in an infinitely long cylinder, this means you should probably do this whole problem in 2D, representing the cylinder by a circle (the effectively-infinite cylinder would be perpendicular to your 2D plane). So I encourage you to attack the problem in 2D. If that works well, you can consider more general wave incidence conditions in a 3D model.
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
4 years ago
17 déc. 2020, 11:50 UTC−5
Ok, I will try it in 2D.