Note: This discussion is about an older version of the COMSOL Multiphysics® software. The information provided may be out of date.
Discussion Closed This discussion was created more than 6 months ago and has been closed. To start a new discussion with a link back to this one, click here.
Adding a new dependent variable in a 2D axial symmetry NS problem
Posted 29 févr. 2012, 08:19 UTC−5 Fluid & Heat Version 4.2a 2 Replies
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Hello
I'm working on a particular case that requires to add a new dependent variable.
Actually, my problem is a 2D axial symmetry one. So i have to calculate the radial and axial velocity and the pressure. They depend on the r and z coordinates only. However, in my problem i also need to take in account the azimuthal velocity that also depends on the r and z coordinates only.
So i want to add this azimuthal velocity and the corresponding equations in the Equation System Subdomain Settings ( i need to add an equation that correspond to the navier stoke equation along the azimuthal coordinate).
Is it possible to do this ? (because when i'm adding a dependent variable in the model navigator i get an error)
Thank you for your help
Etienne
I'm working on a particular case that requires to add a new dependent variable.
Actually, my problem is a 2D axial symmetry one. So i have to calculate the radial and axial velocity and the pressure. They depend on the r and z coordinates only. However, in my problem i also need to take in account the azimuthal velocity that also depends on the r and z coordinates only.
So i want to add this azimuthal velocity and the corresponding equations in the Equation System Subdomain Settings ( i need to add an equation that correspond to the navier stoke equation along the azimuthal coordinate).
Is it possible to do this ? (because when i'm adding a dependent variable in the model navigator i get an error)
Thank you for your help
Etienne
2 Replies Last Post 29 févr. 2012, 11:56 UTC−5
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
If there is a variation in the azimuthal angle, I don't think you can consider it 2D axial symmetric anymore, you will have to go to 3D.
In other words, if there is a circular motion around the line of symmetry, it will need to be modelled using a 3D model.
-Jaap
In other words, if there is a circular motion around the line of symmetry, it will need to be modelled using a 3D model.
-Jaap
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
But i don't have variation in the azimuthal angle.
I just have an azimuthal velocity and i would like to add this variable too input the effect of that velocity my Navier Stokes equations.
(My only simplification in the NS cylindrical equations is that d/dtheta - the variation of the variables along the azimuthal coordinate- is zero)
I just have an azimuthal velocity and i would like to add this variable too input the effect of that velocity my Navier Stokes equations.
(My only simplification in the NS cylindrical equations is that d/dtheta - the variation of the variables along the azimuthal coordinate- is zero)