Menu

Discussion Forum

New Discussion
Filtrer

Note: This discussion is about an older version of the COMSOL Multiphysics® software. The information provided may be out of date.

Discussion Closed This discussion was created more than 6 months ago and has been closed. To start a new discussion with a link back to this one, click here.

Boundary layers mesh

Posted 23 févr. 2012, 13:40 UTC−5 MEMS & Nanotechnology, MEMS & Piezoelectric Devices, Microfluidics, Mesh Version 4.3 3 Replies

Mohamed Zanaty
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Hello all,

My main question is related to "Boundary layers" in meshing for laminar flow physics?
As I understand, Boundary layers are needed when we got a high velocity gradient touching our moving surface. This is the case for turblent flow. But, for laminar flow, why do we need boundary layers in the mesh ?
Does the automatic generation of boundary layers by COMSOL mesher means that we need the these layers for our simulations or I could simply remove it from my mesh?

Thanks in advance
Regards,
Mohamed
3 Replies Last Post 10 oct. 2012, 07:36 UTC−4
Ivar KJELBERG COMSOL Multiphysics(r) fan, retired, former "Senior Expert" at CSEM SA (CH)
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 23 févr. 2012, 15:03 UTC−5
Hi

boundary layers are interesting along all boundaries across which you have strong gradients, particularly for diffusion type equations. Even in laminar flo, along a no-slip boundary you have a rather strong gradient of the velocity, ending at U=0 on the boundary. Therefore COMSOl always proposesby defult boundary layers, for the CFD on such no-slip (and perhaps many others haven checked all cases) boundaries. And this also in laminar flow.

Personally I use boundary layers also in HT transient analysis between material with very different heat diffusiviies, or along boundaries with constant T, where I have a very different initial condition in the material (again essentially for transient solver cases, far less critical for steady state solving))

--
Good luck
Ivar
Hi boundary layers are interesting along all boundaries across which you have strong gradients, particularly for diffusion type equations. Even in laminar flo, along a no-slip boundary you have a rather strong gradient of the velocity, ending at U=0 on the boundary. Therefore COMSOl always proposesby defult boundary layers, for the CFD on such no-slip (and perhaps many others haven checked all cases) boundaries. And this also in laminar flow. Personally I use boundary layers also in HT transient analysis between material with very different heat diffusiviies, or along boundaries with constant T, where I have a very different initial condition in the material (again essentially for transient solver cases, far less critical for steady state solving)) -- Good luck Ivar
Gareth Ward
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 10 oct. 2012, 05:57 UTC−4
Does anyone have any suggestions for joining a boundary layer mesh to a regular tetrahedral mesh. I have an acoustics model which contains a narrow pipe where the thermoacoustics model is implemented but is mostly free space. The boundary mesh seems sensible for modelling the interaction of fluid with a boundary layer but it won't mesh with the remaining space.

Alasdair
Does anyone have any suggestions for joining a boundary layer mesh to a regular tetrahedral mesh. I have an acoustics model which contains a narrow pipe where the thermoacoustics model is implemented but is mostly free space. The boundary mesh seems sensible for modelling the interaction of fluid with a boundary layer but it won't mesh with the remaining space. Alasdair
Ivar KJELBERG COMSOL Multiphysics(r) fan, retired, former "Senior Expert" at CSEM SA (CH)
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 10 oct. 2012, 07:36 UTC−4
Hi
Often a boundary layer goes all the way out to the outer edge of your model (to the in-out-lets), if you need to continue the mesh from there for another physics, you might get around by using a mesh "convert" (to tri) on the in-out-let boundaries, or you might use assembly mode but that is rahter heavy to define all the pairs

--
Good luck
Ivar
Hi Often a boundary layer goes all the way out to the outer edge of your model (to the in-out-lets), if you need to continue the mesh from there for another physics, you might get around by using a mesh "convert" (to tri) on the in-out-let boundaries, or you might use assembly mode but that is rahter heavy to define all the pairs -- Good luck Ivar

Note that while COMSOL employees may participate in the discussion forum, COMSOL® software users who are on-subscription should submit their questions via the Support Center for a more comprehensive response from the Technical Support team.

Suggested Content