Menu

Discussion Forum

New Discussion
Filtrer

Note: This discussion is about an older version of the COMSOL Multiphysics® software. The information provided may be out of date.

Discussion Closed This discussion was created more than 6 months ago and has been closed. To start a new discussion with a link back to this one, click here.

Meshing a 3D model with inclusions

Posted 12 févr. 2012, 04:16 UTC−5 Geometry, Mesh, Structural Mechanics Version 4.2, Version 4.2a 4 Replies

Noy Cohen
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Hello everyone,

I'm trying to solve a 3D model: A cube with a spherical inclusion inside under periodic boundary conditions. I'm having problem with the meshing. If I solve the problem without the inclusion, Comsol solves it only if the meshing is quadrilateral, and once I add the inclusion, I'm not able to mesh.

If I use the physics controlled mesh with extra fine elements, I get the error:
"Failed to find a solution.
Singular matrix.
Returned solution is not converged."

Does anybody have an idea of how to solve this problem?

Thank you.
4 Replies Last Post 12 févr. 2012, 08:26 UTC−5
Ivar KJELBERG COMSOL Multiphysics(r) fan, retired, former "Senior Expert" at CSEM SA (CH)
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 12 févr. 2012, 06:34 UTC−5
Hi

what is the size ration sphere cube, if > 1:10'000 you might have mesh quality issues, then one way is to add a "fictive" (interiour boundary of same material) sphere concentric with the small one to have a better control on the mesh size increase. Then you mesh first the small interiour, then next shell and finally the outer.

But you might have another issue too ;)

--
Good luck
Ivar
Hi what is the size ration sphere cube, if > 1:10'000 you might have mesh quality issues, then one way is to add a "fictive" (interiour boundary of same material) sphere concentric with the small one to have a better control on the mesh size increase. Then you mesh first the small interiour, then next shell and finally the outer. But you might have another issue too ;) -- Good luck Ivar
Noy Cohen
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 12 févr. 2012, 06:50 UTC−5
Hey,

Thanks for the reply.

I examine different sphere to cube ratio, but i think the minimum ratio will be 0.01. What I did is created a cube and a sphere and used the difference operation, and then another sphere. Then I used the "form union" command.

Then I have problems meshing...

How do i add a "fictive" boundary? I'm not familiar with that...

Thanks again...
Hey, Thanks for the reply. I examine different sphere to cube ratio, but i think the minimum ratio will be 0.01. What I did is created a cube and a sphere and used the difference operation, and then another sphere. Then I used the "form union" command. Then I have problems meshing... How do i add a "fictive" boundary? I'm not familiar with that... Thanks again...
Ivar KJELBERG COMSOL Multiphysics(r) fan, retired, former "Senior Expert" at CSEM SA (CH)
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 12 févr. 2012, 06:56 UTC−5
Hi

it's only useful if you have a very large size ration between your parts. Another point you do not need to take any difference or specific union node, two volumes fully embedded are "split up" in "Finish union" mode into two distinct domains

--
Good luck
Ivar
Hi it's only useful if you have a very large size ration between your parts. Another point you do not need to take any difference or specific union node, two volumes fully embedded are "split up" in "Finish union" mode into two distinct domains -- Good luck Ivar
Noy Cohen
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 1 decade ago 12 févr. 2012, 08:26 UTC−5
Thanks...

Any other ideas how to approach this? I'm a bit reluctant to use the symmetry since I have periodic boundary conditions...
Thanks... Any other ideas how to approach this? I'm a bit reluctant to use the symmetry since I have periodic boundary conditions...

Note that while COMSOL employees may participate in the discussion forum, COMSOL® software users who are on-subscription should submit their questions via the Support Center for a more comprehensive response from the Technical Support team.

Suggested Content