Jeff Hiller
COMSOL Employee
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
5 years ago
26 mars 2020, 09:05 UTC−4
Updated:
5 years ago
27 mars 2020, 08:38 UTC−4
In COMSOL, materials, and more generally, physics, are set on the geometry level, not on the mesh level. This is both more logical (since meshes are artefacts of the numerical procedures and have no physical meaning) and more convenient (It makes trying multiple meshes straightforward).
Can you explain what you are ultimately trying to do? I have an inkling that it can be done in some other way in COMSOL.
Best,
Jeff
-------------------
Jeff Hiller
In COMSOL, materials, and more generally, physics, are set on the geometry level, not on the mesh level. This is both more logical (since meshes are artefacts of the numerical procedures and have no physical meaning) and more convenient (It makes trying multiple meshes straightforward).
Can you explain what you are ultimately trying to do? I have an inkling that it can be done in some other way in COMSOL.
Best,
Jeff
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
5 years ago
27 mars 2020, 02:07 UTC−4
In COMSOL, materials, and more generally, physics, are set on the geometry, not on mesh. This is both more logical (since meshes are atefacts of the numerical procedures and have no physical meaning) and more convenient (It makes trying multiple meshes straight forward).
Can you explain what you are ultimately tring to do? I have an inkling that it can be done in some other way in COMSOL.
Best,
Jeff
Thanks Jeff.
I want to reconstruct an image using capacitance tomography. The principle is that permittivity distribution of object in the detection zone will lead to changes of detection capacitance. To realize this method, I need to obtain a sensitive map.
The sensitive map consists of several mesh elements. Each mesh element corresponds to a specific ΔC (capacitance). To calculate the ΔC of a certain mesh element (label as Mi), the permittivity of Mi (i=1,2,....N) should be set as 27, and the rest of mesh elements are 1. Then calculate the case in 'es' physics. Every mesh elements should be in loop and done as above . In this way, ΔC corresponding to N mesh elements can form the sensitive map.
That is what I want to do. I think there are two ways to realize it. One is to define specific material property for mesh elements. The other is to make mesh become geometry. But I can't find the convinient way to complete it. If you have any good idea, please let me know. Anything is OK as long as it helps. Thanks again.
Shirley Chen
>In COMSOL, materials, and more generally, physics, are set on the geometry, not on mesh. This is both more logical (since meshes are atefacts of the numerical procedures and have no physical meaning) and more convenient (It makes trying multiple meshes straight forward).
>
>Can you explain what you are ultimately tring to do? I have an inkling that it can be done in some other way in COMSOL.
>
>Best,
>
>Jeff
Thanks Jeff.
I want to reconstruct an image using capacitance tomography. The principle is that permittivity distribution of object in the detection zone will lead to changes of detection capacitance. To realize this method, I need to obtain a sensitive map.
The sensitive map consists of several mesh elements. Each mesh element corresponds to a specific ΔC (capacitance). To calculate the ΔC of a certain mesh element (label as Mi), the permittivity of Mi (i=1,2,....N) should be set as 27, and the rest of mesh elements are 1. Then calculate the case in 'es' physics. Every mesh elements should be in loop and done as above . In this way, ΔC corresponding to N mesh elements can form the sensitive map.
That is what I want to do. I think there are two ways to realize it. One is to define specific material property for mesh elements. The other is to make mesh become geometry. But I can't find the convinient way to complete it. If you have any good idea, please let me know. Anything is OK as long as it helps. Thanks again.
Shirley Chen