Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
7 years ago
17 sept. 2017, 18:12 UTC−4
Not quite sure what is the reason as I havent used assembly to solve transport process. But I do believe when you right click on pair you will see fallback features allowing you to use continuous boundary condition.
-------------------
Seeking collaborating partners for comsol consulting service
Not quite sure what is the reason as I havent used assembly to solve transport process. But I do believe when you right click on pair you will see fallback features allowing you to use continuous boundary condition.
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
7 years ago
18 sept. 2017, 13:55 UTC−4
Not quite sure what is the reason as I havent used assembly to solve transport process. But I do believe when you right click on pair you will see fallback features allowing you to use continuous boundary condition.
Thank you for your reply, Yu.
Actually, there is a subnode named 'Continuity' in the 'pair'. But as I metioned, even I assign the contact interface as 'Continuity', the subnode under 'Continuity' is still 'no flux' which means this interface is still ynder discontinuous boundary condition. So confused...
>Not quite sure what is the reason as I havent used assembly to solve transport process. But I do believe when you right click on pair you will see fallback features allowing you to use continuous boundary condition.
Thank you for your reply, Yu.
Actually, there is a subnode named 'Continuity' in the 'pair'. But as I metioned, even I assign the contact interface as 'Continuity', the subnode under 'Continuity' is still 'no flux' which means this interface is still ynder discontinuous boundary condition. So confused...