Discussion Closed This discussion was created more than 6 months ago and has been closed. To start a new discussion with a link back to this one, click here.
A very simple PDE problem, but error. (mph file is attached V4.0)
Posted 10 oct. 2010, 22:55 UTC−4 4 Replies
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Hi, everyone
I am in trouble when testing the method that solving the PDE problem by Comsol.
A very simple problem that: du/dx=2*x is be solved with the boundary condition of u=1 when x=1. It is very strange that the result is oscillating. what wrong with it?
The mph file is in the attachment.
Thank you very much!
youf.
I am in trouble when testing the method that solving the PDE problem by Comsol.
A very simple problem that: du/dx=2*x is be solved with the boundary condition of u=1 when x=1. It is very strange that the result is oscillating. what wrong with it?
The mph file is in the attachment.
Thank you very much!
youf.
Attachments:
4 Replies Last Post 11 oct. 2010, 07:02 UTC−4
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
well
the reason you have thos problem is because the way you wrote the pde is inconsistent with your choice of BC
if you set alpha ,called conserbative flux coefficient FOR A REASON. to be non zero in the pde, the asociated bc are strictlyd defined
for profund fundamental reasons AND WILL INCLUDE alpha as well [ they are writtenin the gui so you see what it is... you are not free to do what you want.
.To resolve your pde you need to use the beta coefficient in the coefficient pde and set te alpha to zero and then you can set your dirichlet condition. you need also to nmake sure that the second BC is free otherwise you will have a default BC there that will ake your problem overconstrained and again oscillating solution.
The thing to keep in mind here is that resolviong pde requires a lottle knowledhege of applied math if you want to wander beyond prepackaged prepared solution.
JF
the reason you have thos problem is because the way you wrote the pde is inconsistent with your choice of BC
if you set alpha ,called conserbative flux coefficient FOR A REASON. to be non zero in the pde, the asociated bc are strictlyd defined
for profund fundamental reasons AND WILL INCLUDE alpha as well [ they are writtenin the gui so you see what it is... you are not free to do what you want.
.To resolve your pde you need to use the beta coefficient in the coefficient pde and set te alpha to zero and then you can set your dirichlet condition. you need also to nmake sure that the second BC is free otherwise you will have a default BC there that will ake your problem overconstrained and again oscillating solution.
The thing to keep in mind here is that resolviong pde requires a lottle knowledhege of applied math if you want to wander beyond prepackaged prepared solution.
JF
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
A small queation:
How to set the second BC is free in COMSOL "boundary condition"?
How to set the second BC is free in COMSOL "boundary condition"?
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
In 3.5a just put h=0 in the dirichlet BC.
I have not use pde module with 4.x so far so I dont know if it has changed or not.
JF
I have not use pde module with 4.x so far so I dont know if it has changed or not.
JF
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
Hi,JF
Thanks for your help!
The problem has been resolved after I adjusted the gui following your advices. Then I feel that I must learn the PDE profoundly.
Thank you again!
youf.
Thanks for your help!
The problem has been resolved after I adjusted the gui following your advices. Then I feel that I must learn the PDE profoundly.
Thank you again!
youf.